US Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Pishon Holding LLC et al

Filing 45

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 39 Motion for Relief from Stay as to Defendant Grace Hong; granting Plaintiff's 40 Motion to Set Aside Default as to Defendants Pishon and Laurence Hong; granting Plaintiff's 41 Motion to Amend Complaint, signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SWT) Counsel is directed to e-file their Amended Complaint.

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 15 16 PISHON HOLDING LLC, SUNG HONG a/k/a LAWRENCE HONG; and HYUN JOO HONG a/k/a GRANCE HONG, CASE NO. C17-847-MJP ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LIMITED RELIEF FROM STAY, GRANTING MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT, AND GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (“CFTC”) Motion for Limited Relief from Stay as to Defendant Grace Hong (Dkt. No. 39), Motion to Set Aside Default as to Defendants Pishon Holding LLC and Lawrence Hong (Dkt. No. 40), and Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (Dkt. No. 41). The CFTC alleges that, since September 2015, Defendants have fraudulently solicited more than $11 million from customers of commodity futures contracts. (See Dkt. No. 1.) Because there is a co-pending criminal case, United States v. Hong, Case No. 17-CR-00163TSZ, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LIMITED RELIEF FROM STAY, GRANTING MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT, AND GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT - 1 1 arising out of the same allegations, the civil case is currently stayed. (See Dkt. No. 34.) On June 2 1, 2017, the Court entered an ex parte Statutory Restraining Order (“SRO”) to prevent 3 Defendants from concealing assets. (See Dkt. No. 5.) Under the terms of the SRO, Ms. Hong 4 was permitted to maintain only a single checking account, and agreed to “deposit into this 5 checking account all income, monetary gains, or other pecuniary proceeds.” (Dkt. No. 39 at 4.) 6 The CFTC alleges that Ms. Hong violated the SRO by having a deposit for a cancelled yacht 7 order transferred to her mother-in-law rather than into the checking account. (Id. at 4.) 8 The CFTC now moves to (1) have the default entered against Pishon Holding LLC and 9 Mr. Wong set aside so that it may amend the complaint to add claims for misappropriation; (2) 10 amend the complaint to add a claim for misappropriation; and (3) lift the stay for the limited 11 purpose of conducting discovery into whether Ms. Hong violated the terms of the SRO. (See 12 Dkt. Nos. 39, 40, 41.) Ms. Hong, through counsel, objects in light of “the on-going, labor 13 intensive progression of the highly complex criminal prosecution underlying this civil matter.” 14 (Dkt. No. 42 at 2.) 15 The Court finds that the CFTC has established good cause for each of its Motions. On 16 the other hand, Ms. Hong has failed to show that she will be prejudiced should they be granted. 17 Therefore, the Court GRANTS the Motion to Set Aside Default as to Defendants Pishon Holding 18 LLC and Lawrence Hong (Dkt. No. 40) and GRANTS the Motion for Leave to Amend 19 Complaint (Dkt. No. 41). The Court GRANTS the Motion for Limited Relief from Stay as to 20 Defendant Grace Hong (Dkt. No. 39), provided that the discovery requested shall not burden Ms. 21 Hong’s Fifth Amendment rights. 22 23 24 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LIMITED RELIEF FROM STAY, GRANTING MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT, AND GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT - 2 1 The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel. 2 Dated February 15, 2018. 4 A 5 Marsha J. Pechman United States District Judge 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LIMITED RELIEF FROM STAY, GRANTING MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT, AND GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?