Moi v. Chihuly Studio, Inc. et al

Filing 98

ORDER granting 80 Motion to File Documents Under Seal, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (KERR)

Download PDF
1 THE HONORABLE ROBERT S. LASNIK 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 MICHAEL MOI, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CHIHULY STUDIO, INC., a Washington corporation; DALE CHIHULY, individually and as a married person; LESLIE CHIHULY, individually and as a married person, 17 CHIHULY, INC., a Washington corporation; and DALE CHIHULY, individually, CounterclaimPlaintiffs, 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ AND COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Defendants. 15 16 No. 2:17-cv-00853-RSL v. MICHAEL MOI, an individual, CounterclaimDefendant This matter came before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to File Documents Under Seal. Dkt. # 80. The motion is unopposed. Having considered the motion and all papers filed in support, the Court finds as follows: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL (No. 2:17-cv-00853-RSL) – 1 1 2 3 1. The good cause standard applies to the sealing of the Motion for Protective Order because the motion is not dispositive; and 2. Good cause exists to seal the documents identified in the Motion to Seal. 4 5 The Motion to Seal is GRANTED. The following documents shall remain under seal: 6 • Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. # 84); and 7 • Exhibits A, B, C, and D to the Declaration of Harry H. Schneider, Jr. in Support 8 of Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. # 85). 9 10 Publicly-available redacted versions of these documents are in the record at Dkt. # 82 and # 83. 11 12 Dated this 6th day of February, 2019. 13 A Robert S. Lasnik 14 United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL (No. 2:17-cv-00853-RSL) – 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?