United States of America v. Burns et al
ORDER by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. In light of defendant/judgmentdebtors objections, the Clerk of Court is directed to give this matter a civil action number and assign it in rotation. The Writ of Garnishment shall remain in effect during the pendency of this action, but judgment shall not be entered absent further order of the Court. (CDA)(cc: defendant)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
RODNEY LEE BURNS,
AREVA NP INC.,
Case No. MC17-0048RSL
This matter comes before the Court on defendant/judgment debtor’s request for a
hearing in the above-captioned garnishment action. Dkt. # 7. In light of defendant/judgment
debtor’s objections, the Clerk of Court is directed to give this matter a civil action number and
assign it in rotation. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 3202(d) and § 3205(c)(5), the requested hearing is
to be held as soon as practicable. The Writ of Garnishment shall remain in effect during the
pendency of this action, but judgment shall not be entered absent further order of the Court.
Dated this 7th day of June, 2017.
Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?