Beck et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
ORDER setting deadline of 10/2/2017 for Defendants to file their reply memorandum re 10 Motion to dismiss. Clerk directed to renote Defendants' 10 Motion to dismiss for 10/2/2017. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
PAUL J. BECK, et al.,
U.S. BANK NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, et al.,
CASE NO. C17-0882JLR
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
On September 18, 2017, the court granted Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for an
extension of time to file a response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (9/18/17 Order
(Dkt. # 20).) The court’s order grants Plaintiffs an extension until Tuesday, September
26, 2017, to file their response. (See id. at 3.) Accordingly, the court ORDERS
Defendants to file their reply memorandum, if any, no later than Monday, October 2,
2017, and also DIRECTS the Clerk to renote Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 10)
for that same day.
ORDER - 1
The court also notes that this case is in its preliminary stages and Plaintiffs’
counsel has already twice missed a court deadline due at least in part to his heavy
caseload. (See OSC (Dkt. # 12); OSC Resp. (Dkt. # 13); Mot. for Extension (Dkt. # 17);
9/18/17 Order.) The court warns Plaintiffs’ counsel that he must arrange his practice in a
manner that permits him to meet the court deadlines and other obligations that this
litigation entails. The court will not continue to indulge counsel’s failure to adhere to its
scheduling orders and other deadlines without imposing consequences.
Dated this 19th day of September, 2017.
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?