Beck et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al

Filing 21

ORDER setting deadline of 10/2/2017 for Defendants to file their reply memorandum re 10 Motion to dismiss. Clerk directed to renote Defendants' 10 Motion to dismiss for 10/2/2017. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 PAUL J. BECK, et al., Plaintiffs, 11 v. 12 13 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al., 14 CASE NO. C17-0882JLR ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Defendants. 15 On September 18, 2017, the court granted Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for an 16 extension of time to file a response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (9/18/17 Order 17 (Dkt. # 20).) The court’s order grants Plaintiffs an extension until Tuesday, September 18 26, 2017, to file their response. (See id. at 3.) Accordingly, the court ORDERS 19 Defendants to file their reply memorandum, if any, no later than Monday, October 2, 20 2017, and also DIRECTS the Clerk to renote Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 10) 21 for that same day. 22 ORDER - 1 1 The court also notes that this case is in its preliminary stages and Plaintiffs’ 2 counsel has already twice missed a court deadline due at least in part to his heavy 3 caseload. (See OSC (Dkt. # 12); OSC Resp. (Dkt. # 13); Mot. for Extension (Dkt. # 17); 4 9/18/17 Order.) The court warns Plaintiffs’ counsel that he must arrange his practice in a 5 manner that permits him to meet the court deadlines and other obligations that this 6 litigation entails. The court will not continue to indulge counsel’s failure to adhere to its 7 scheduling orders and other deadlines without imposing consequences. 8 Dated this 19th day of September, 2017. 9 10 A 11 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?