Houston v. Convergent Outsourcing Inc

Filing 3

ORDER denying 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of this order to correct this deficiency, signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS with standard IFP form)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

7
8
9

TIERRA HOUSTON,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12

Case No. C17-883-RSL
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v.
CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC.,

13

Defendant.

14
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis

15
16

(“IFP”) in the above-entitled action. Dkt. 1. After careful consideration of the application, the

17

governing law, and the balance of the record, the Court ORDERS as follows:
(1)

18

Plaintiff’s application to proceed IFP (Dkt. 1) is DENIED. Plaintiff’s

19

application is deficient because she failed to comply with LCR 3(b). Specifically, plaintiff

20

failed to use the proper IFP application form approved for use in this district.
(2)

21

Plaintiff is GRANTED LEAVE TO AMEND, and shall have 30 days from the

22

date of this Order to correct this deficiency. Plaintiff is advised that this case may be subject to

23

dismissal if she does not respond to this Order or fails to correct this deficiency.

24

//

25

//

26

ORDER
PAGE - 1

1
2
3

(3)

The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a blank copy of the Court’s IFP

application, a standard written consent for payment of costs form, and a copy of this Order.
DATED this 13th day of June, 2017.

A

4
5

JAMES P. DONOHUE
Chief United States Magistrate Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

ORDER
PAGE - 2