Hover et al v. GMAC Mortgage Corporation et al
ORDER granting in part Plaintiff's 23 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response; 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM : is Re-Noted for 9/29/2017. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' response is due no later than September 25, 2017. No further extension of time will be granted. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (TH) (cc: Plaintiffs)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
LYNN DALE HOVER and MILA JEAN
GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION
aka DITECH FINANCIAL LLC dba
ditech.com, et al.,
) CASE NO. C17-0902 RSM
) ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF
) TIME TO FILE RESPONSE
THIS MATTER COMES before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Extension of Time
to respond to Defendant Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.’ pending motion to dismiss. Dkt. #23.
Defendant’s motion was noted for consideration on September 1, 2017, and therefore Plaintiffs’
response was due no later than August 28, 2017. See Dkt. #7 and Local Civil Rule 7(d)(3).
Plaintiffs did not file the instant motion until August 31st. Plaintiffs assert that they need more
time to respond as they are pro se in this matter and need more time to review the motion and
research and formulate an adequate response. Dkt. #23. Accordingly, they ask for an extension
of time until September 30, 2017, to file a response. Id. Defendant opposes the motion, arguing
that the motion was untimely, it will increase the costs of litigation for Defendant, and Plaintiffs
offer no legitimate explanation for their request. Dkt. #24.
PAGE - 1
Having reviewed Plaintiffs’ motion and the remainder of the record, the Court hereby
1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to file a response to Defendant Northwest
Trustee Services, Inc.’s pending motion to dismiss (Dkt. #23) is GRANTED IN
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #7) shall be RE-NOTED for
consideration on September 29, 2017. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ response is due no
later than September 25, 2017. No further extension of time will be granted.
2. Plaintiffs are further warned that they are expected to be familiar with the Court’s
Local Rules, particularly those related to the filing of motions and responses. Those
3. Plaintiffs have not moved for an extension of time to respond to the pending motions
to dismiss filed by Defendants Fannie Mae, MERS, Nationstar Mortgager LLC, Bank
of America, N.A., and Ditech Financial. Dkts. #17, #19 and #22. Those motions are
ripe for review and no extension of time to respond to those motions has been
DATED this 15th day of September 2017.
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?