Hover et al v. GMAC Mortgage Corporation et al
Filing
31
ORDER granting parties' 25 Joint MOTION to Amend 6 Joint Status Report Order. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(TH) (cc: Plaintiffs)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
SEATTLE DIVISION
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
LYNN DALE HOVER AND MILA JEAN
HOVER,
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
vs.
)
)
GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION aka
)
DITECH FINANCIAL LLC dba DITECH.COM, )
et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
18
19
entry of an order resetting the deadlines for the parties’ LCR 16 discovery conference and
their join status report came before the court on September 15, 2017. The court, having
reviewed the parties’ filings, the court file, and otherwise being fully advised,
HEREBY ORDERS that Ditech’s Motion is Granted. The deadline for the parties’
20
21
ORDER RE DITECH FINANCIAL LLC’S
MOTION TO AMEND CASE
SCHEDULING ORDER
Pursuant to LCR 7, Defendant Ditech Financial LLC’s (“Ditech”) motion for the
16
17
Case No. C17-902 RSM
Rule 16 conference will be reset to a date 20 days after the court rules on the parties’
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER RE MOTION TO AMEND CASE MANAGEMENT
DEADLINES - Page 1
ORDER
SUSSMAN SHANK LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1000 SW BROADWAY, SUITE 1400
PORTLAND, OREGON 97205-3089
TELEPHONE (503) 227-1111
FACSIMILE (503) 248-0130
1
pending Motions to Dismiss, and the deadline for the Joint Status Report under
2
FRCP 26(f) will be reset to a date 30 days after the court rules in the FRCP 12 motions.
Dated this 15th day of September 2017.
3
4
A
5
6
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
Submitted By:
10
11
SUSSMAN SHANK LLP
12
By s/ William G. Fig
William G. Fig, WSBA 33943
Attorneys for Defendant Ditech Financial LLC
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER RE MOTION TO AMEND CASE MANAGEMENT
DEADLINES - Page 2
ORDER
SUSSMAN SHANK LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1000 SW BROADWAY, SUITE 1400
PORTLAND, OREGON 97205-3089
TELEPHONE (503) 227-1111
FACSIMILE (503) 248-0130
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?