King County v. City of Sammamish
Filing
29
MINUTE ORDER deferring ruling on Defendant's 16 Motion to Dismiss. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (SWT)
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
KING COUNTY,
10
11
12
13
CASE NO. C17-0921-JCC
Plaintiff,
MINUTE ORDER
v.
CITY OF SAMMAMISH,
Defendant.
14
15
16
17
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C.
Coughenour, United States District Judge:
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of
18
jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 16) and Plaintiff’s subsequent amended complaint (Dkt. No. 18).
19
Defendant’s motion alleged that Plaintiff’s initial complaint failed to present a federal question
20
sufficient to create jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. (Dkt. No. 16 at 1.) Plaintiff’s amended
21
complaint alleged multiple new federal claims. (Dkt. No. 18 at 16-18.)
22
Defendant recognizes that, in light of the amended complaint, it would not be appropriate
23
for the Court to rule on its motion to dismiss at this time. (Dkt. No. 28 at 2.) Defendant intends to
24
move for summary judgment dismissal of the newly alleged claims. (Id.) If that motion is
25
granted, the original complaint will become the operative pleading again and Defendant’s motion
26
to dismiss will again be appropriate to consider.
MINUTE ORDER C17-0921-JCC
PAGE - 1
1
Accordingly, the Court DEFERS ruling on the motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 16) and
2
directs the Clerk to TERMINATE the motion so it is no longer active. Should Plaintiff’s newly
3
alleged claims be stricken in the future, Defendant may ask the Court to reactivate the motion to
4
dismiss (Dkt. No. 16) and set a new noting date.
5
DATED this 21st day of July 2017.
6
William M. McCool
Clerk of Court
7
s/Paula McNabb
Deputy Clerk
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
MINUTE ORDER C17-0921-JCC
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?