King County v. City of Sammamish
Filing
41
MINUTE ORDER RE-NOTING Defendant City of Sammamish's 40 MOTION for Reconsideration re 36 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction ; Noting Date 9/8/2017, Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (SWT)
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
KING COUNTY,
10
11
12
CASE NO. C17-0921-JCC
Plaintiff,
MINUTE ORDER
v.
CITY OF SAMMAMISH,
13
Defendant.
14
15
16
17
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C.
Coughenour, United States District Judge:
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant City of Sammamish’s motion for
18
clarification (Dkt. No. 40) The City asks the Court to clarify the intent of the following language
19
from its order granting Plaintiff King County’s motion for preliminary injunction:
20
“The City shall not take any additional actions to impede or delay King County’s
21
construction of the ELST, including attempts to require stop signs oriented towards trail
22
users at the intersections with 206th Avenue SE and SE 33rd Street.”
23
24
(Dkt. No. 36 at 8.)
This language was adopted from the County’s proposed order, (see Dkt. No. 7-1 at 2), in
25
an attempt to fully and precisely address the relief the County sought. The Court did not intend
26
this language to expand its ruling beyond the relief sought by the County and the issues
MINUTE ORDER C17-0921-JCC
PAGE - 1
1
discussed and resolved in the order. To the extent this remains unclear, the Court recommends
2
that the parties consult among themselves to reach a reasonable and cooperative resolution.
3
If the parties cannot come to a common understanding, the County may file a
4
response to the City’s current motion (Dkt. No. 40) by Friday, September 1, 2017. The
5
response shall be limited to 6 pages. The City may then file a reply brief by Friday,
6
September 8, 2017. The reply shall be limited to three pages.
7
The Clerk is directed to RENOTE the motion for clarification (Dkt. No. 40) for Friday,
8
September 8, 2017. If the parties do not submit briefing in accordance with the schedule
9
established above, the motion for clarification (Dkt. No. 40) shall be deemed MOOT and will be
10
11
terminated.
DATED this 21st day of August 2017.
12
William M. McCool
Clerk of Court
13
s/Paula McNabb
Deputy Clerk
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
MINUTE ORDER C17-0921-JCC
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?