King County v. City of Sammamish

Filing 43

MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 42 stipulation and proposed revision to the preliminary injunction order of August 8, 2017; noting date of September 8, 2017 for 40 Motion for Clarification is stricken. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)

Download PDF
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 KING COUNTY, 10 11 12 CASE NO. C17-0921-JCC Plaintiff, MINUTE ORDER v. CITY OF SAMMAMISH, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 17 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C. Coughenour, United States District Judge: This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ stipulation and proposed revision to 18 the preliminary injunction order of August 8, 2017 (Dkt. No. 42). After considering this 19 stipulation, IT IS HEARBY ORDERED that Sentence III-2 in the Conclusion section of the 20 Preliminary Injunction Order on page 8 (Dkt. No. 36) is hereby stricken and replaced with the 21 following language: 22 “2. The City shall not take any additional actions to impede or delay King 23 County’s construction of the intersections at 206th Avenue SE and SE 33rd 24 Street, including any attempts to orient stop signs toward trail users.” 25 The Court's Preliminary Injunction Order remains the same in all other respects. Further, 26 per the parties’ stipulation, the City retains the right to appeal the preliminary injunction as revised MINUTE ORDER C17-0921-JCC PAGE - 1 1 2 3 4 herein. The Court also DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to strike the noting date of September 8, 2017 for the motion for clarification (Dkt. No. 41). DATED this 1st day of September 2017. 5 William M. McCool Clerk of Court 6 s/Paula McNabb Deputy Clerk 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 MINUTE ORDER C17-0921-JCC PAGE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?