Shevyakov v. Sessions et al
Filing
7
ORDER WITHDRAWING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DIRECTING RETURN AND STATUS REPORT, § 2241 PETITION by Hon. James P. Donohue. Electronic posting of this Order shall effect service on the United States Attorney and respondent(s). Within 30 days of the date this Order is posted, respondent(s) shall file a return and status report. In accordance with LCR 7, respondent(s) shall note it for consideration on the fourth Friday after it is filed. Petitioner may file and serve a response not later than the Monday immediately preceding the Friday appointed for consideration of the matter. Respondent(s) may file and serve a reply not later than the Friday designated for consideration of the matter. (cc: petitioner)(ST)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
VITALY SHEVYAKOV,
Petitioner,
9
10
11
v.
JEFFERSON SESSIONS, et al.,
Case No. C17-923-JCC-JPD
ORDER WITHDRAWING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION AND
DIRECTING RETURN AND STATUS
REPORT, § 2241 PETITION
Respondents.
12
13
14
Petitioner initiated this 28 U.S.C. § 2241 action by filing an application to proceed in
15
forma pauperis (“IFP”), a proposed habeas petition challenging his detention by U.S.
16
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”), a motion to appoint counsel, and a letter of
17
support from the Office of the Federal Public Defender. On June 28, 2017, the Court issued a
18
Report and Recommendation recommending that petitioner’s IFP application be denied. Dkt. 3.
19
On July 7, 2017, petitioner paid the filing fee. Based on the foregoing, the Court ORDERS:
20
21
22
23
(1)
The Report and Recommendation regarding petitioner’s IFP application, Dkt. 3, is
WITHDRAWN as moot.
(2)
If not previously accomplished, electronic posting of this Order and petitioner’s
§ 2241 habeas petition shall effect service upon the United States Attorney of the petition and all
ORDER WITHDRAWING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND DIRECTING
RETURN AND STATUS REPORT, § 2241
PETITION - 1
1
supporting documents. Service upon the United States Attorney is deemed to be service upon
2
the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Seattle Field Office Director for ICE, the Warden of the
3
Northwest Detention Center, and ICE.
(3)
4
Within 30 days of the date this Order is posted, respondent(s) shall show cause
5
why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted by filing a return as provided in 28 U.S.C. §
6
2243. As a part of such return, respondent(s) shall address and submit evidence relevant to
7
petitioner’s allegation that his detention is unlawful because ICE is unable to effectuate his
8
removal in the reasonably foreseeable future. Respondent(s) shall file the return with the Clerk
9
of the Court and shall serve a copy upon petitioner.
(4)
10
The return will be treated in accordance with LCR 7. Accordingly, on the face of
11
the return, respondent(s) shall note it for consideration on the fourth Friday after it is filed, and
12
the Clerk shall note the return accordingly. Petitioner may file and serve a response not later
13
than the Monday immediately preceding the Friday appointed for consideration of the matter,
14
and respondent(s) may file and serve a reply brief not later than the Friday designated for
15
consideration of the matter.
(5)
16
If petitioner’s custody status changes at any point during this litigation,
17
respondent(s) shall file a status update with the Court as soon as possible and no later than
18
14 days after the change.
19
//
20
//
21
//
22
//
23
//
ORDER WITHDRAWING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND DIRECTING
RETURN AND STATUS REPORT, § 2241
PETITION - 2
1
2
3
(6)
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner, the Federal Public
Defender, and the Honorable John C. Coughenour.
Dated this 11th day of July, 2017.
4
A
5
JAMES P. DONOHUE
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER WITHDRAWING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND DIRECTING
RETURN AND STATUS REPORT, § 2241
PETITION - 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?