Nguyen v. Sessions et al

Filing 8

ORDER WITHDRAWING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DIRECTING RETURN AND STATUS REPORT, § 2241 PETITION re 4 Report and Recommendation; respondent to show cause within 30 days signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler.(RS) cc petitioner

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 THUY NGUYEN, Petitioner, 9 10 11 v. JEFFERSON SESSIONS, et al., Case No. C17-0926-JCC-MAT ORDER WITHDRAWING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DIRECTING RETURN AND STATUS REPORT, § 2241 PETITION Respondents. 12 13 14 Petitioner initiated this 28 U.S.C. § 2241 action by filing an application to proceed in forma 15 pauperis (“IFP”), a proposed habeas petition challenging his detention by U.S. Immigration and 16 Customs Enforcement (“ICE”), a motion to appoint counsel, and a letter of support from the Office 17 of the Federal Public Defender. On June 22, 2017, the Court issued a Report and Recommendation 18 recommending that petitioner’s IFP application be denied. (Dkt. 4.) The same day, petitioner paid 19 the filing fee. Based on the foregoing, the Court ORDERS: 20 21 22 23 (1) The Report and Recommendation regarding petitioner’s IFP application (Dkt. 4) is WITHDRAWN as moot. (2) If not previously accomplished, electronic posting of this Order and petitioner’s § 2241 habeas petition shall effect service upon the United States Attorney of the petition and all ORDER WITHDRAWING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DIRECTING RETURN AND STATUS REPORT, § 2241 PETITION - 1 1 supporting documents. Service upon the United States Attorney is deemed to be service upon the 2 Secretary of Homeland Security, the Seattle Field Office Director for ICE, the Warden of the 3 Northwest Detention Center, and ICE. (3) 4 Within 30 days of the date this Order is posted, respondent(s) shall show cause 5 why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted by filing a return as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 6 2243. As a part of such return, respondent(s) shall address and submit evidence relevant to 7 petitioner’s allegation that his detention is unlawful because ICE is unable to effectuate his 8 removal in the reasonably foreseeable future. Respondent(s) shall file the return with the Clerk of 9 the Court and shall serve a copy upon petitioner. (4) 10 The return will be treated in accordance with LCR 7. Accordingly, on the face of 11 the return, respondent(s) shall note it for consideration on the fourth Friday after it is filed, and the 12 Clerk shall note the return accordingly. Petitioner may file and serve a response not later than the 13 Monday immediately preceding the Friday appointed for consideration of the matter, and 14 respondent(s) may file and serve a reply brief not later than the Friday designated for consideration 15 of the matter. (5) 16 If petitioner’s custody status changes at any point during this litigation, 17 respondent(s) shall file a status update with the Court as soon as possible and no later than 18 14 days after the change. (6) 19 The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner, the Federal Public 20 Defender, and the Honorable John C. Coughenour. 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// ORDER WITHDRAWING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DIRECTING RETURN AND STATUS REPORT, § 2241 PETITION - 2 1 Dated this 28th day of June, 2017. 2 A 3 Mary Alice Theiler United States Magistrate Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER WITHDRAWING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DIRECTING RETURN AND STATUS REPORT, § 2241 PETITION - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?