Dacumos v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation et al

Filing 51

ORDER denying as moot plaintiff's 32 Motion to Compel; denying as moot plaintiff's 50 Motion to Amend the Motion to Compel, signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 5 6 7 8 CAREN ROSE DACUMOS, Plaintiff, 9 10 11 12 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL AS MOOT v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. 13 14 Case No. C17-0964RSM THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel. Dkt. #32. 15 Although the Court does not condone gamesmanship with respect to discovery, the Court finds 16 17 this motion to be moot. Since the time the motion was filed, the Court has granted Defendant 18 Toyota Motor Credit Corporation judgment on the pleadings, and dismissed the cause of action 19 against it with leave to amend. Dkt. #33. Unless and until Plaintiff files an Amended Complaint 20 and this matter proceeds, discovery is no longer at issue. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to 21 22 23 24 compel (Dkt. #32) is DENIED. Likewise, the subsequently-filed motion to amend the motion to compel (Dkt. #50) is also DENIED as moot. DATED this 12 day of January, 2018. 25 A 26 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 ORDER PAGE - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?