Jennings(s) v. Duke Partners II, LLC et al

Filing 11

ORDER granting defendant Wells Fargo Bank, NA's 6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; plaintiff's claims againstWells Fargo Bank, N.A. are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)(Wells Fargo terminated.) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

6
7
8

SUZANNE JENNINGS(S),

9
10
11
12

Case No. C17-969RSL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING WELLS
FARGO BANK, N.A.’S MOTION TO
DISMISS

v.
DUKE PARTNERS II, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.

13
14

This matter comes before the Court on the motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P.

15

12(b)(6) of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Dkt. # 6. Plaintiff has not opposed defendant’s

16

motion to dismiss, and the Court considers such a failure to be “an admission that the motion has

17

merit.” Local Civil Rule 7(b)(2). The Court has also reviewed the record in this matter and

18

finds that plaintiff’s claims against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. are barred by res judicata and also

19

insufficiently pled. Defendant’s motion is therefore GRANTED, and plaintiff’s claims against

20

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

21

Dated this 3rd day of August, 2017.

22
23

A

24

Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge

25
26

ORDER GRANTING WELLS FARGO’S MOTION TO DISMISS - 1