Jennings(s) v. Duke Partners II, LLC et al

Filing 11

ORDER granting defendant Wells Fargo Bank, NA's 6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; plaintiff's claims againstWells Fargo Bank, N.A. are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)(Wells Fargo terminated.) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 SUZANNE JENNINGS(S), 9 10 11 12 Case No. C17-969RSL Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.’S MOTION TO DISMISS v. DUKE PARTNERS II, LLC, et al., Defendants. 13 14 This matter comes before the Court on the motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 12(b)(6) of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Dkt. # 6. Plaintiff has not opposed defendant’s 16 motion to dismiss, and the Court considers such a failure to be “an admission that the motion has 17 merit.” Local Civil Rule 7(b)(2). The Court has also reviewed the record in this matter and 18 finds that plaintiff’s claims against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. are barred by res judicata and also 19 insufficiently pled. Defendant’s motion is therefore GRANTED, and plaintiff’s claims against 20 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. 21 Dated this 3rd day of August, 2017. 22 23 A 24 Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 25 26 ORDER GRANTING WELLS FARGO’S MOTION TO DISMISS - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?