Quarterdeck Condominium Association of Apartment Owners v. Safeco Insurance Company et al
Filing
24
MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 23 Stipulation and DISMISSES all claims against Defendant Arrowood Surplus Lines Insurance Company, formerly known as Royal Surplus Lines Insurance Company, without prejudice and without an award of attorney fees or costs to either party. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
10
11
QUARTERDECK CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS,
CASE NO. C17-0999-JCC
MINUTE ORDER
Plaintiff,
v.
12
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C.
Coughenour, United States District Judge:
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff and Defendant Arrowood Surplus Lines
Insurance Company’s stipulated motion to dismiss without prejudice (Dkt. No. 23). Pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), the Court GRANTS the parties’ stipulation and
DISMISSES all claims against Defendant Arrowood Surplus Lines Insurance Company,
formerly known as Royal Surplus Lines Insurance Company, without prejudice and without an
award of attorney fees or costs to either party. This order does not dismiss claims against any
other party.
All future pleadings in this matter shall be captioned Quarterdeck Condominium
Association of Apartment Owners v. Commonwealth Insurance Company of America, et al.
MINUTE ORDER
C17-0999-JCC
PAGE - 1
1
DATED this 22nd day of January 2018.
2
William M. McCool
Clerk of Court
3
s/Tomas Hernandez
Deputy Clerk
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
MINUTE ORDER
C17-0999-JCC
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?