Owens v. John Doe et al
Filing
26
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 21 Motion for Extension of Time and denying without prejudice Plaintiff's 22 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The deadline to complete discovery is extended from January 9, 2018 to February 8, 2018. The deadline to file and serve dispositive motions is extended from February 8, 2018 to March 12, 2018. Signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Mychal Owens, Prisoner ID: 878377) (TH)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
MYCHAL OWENS,
Plaintiff,
10
11
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO
COMPLETE DISCOVERY AND
DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT
OF COUNSEL
v.
JOHN DOE, et al.,
12
13
CASE NO. C17-1027-JCC-BAT
Defendants.
9
Plaintiff Mychal Owens has filed a motion for extension of time to complete discovery
14
(Dkt. 21) and a motion to appoint counsel (Dkt. 22). For the following reasons, the Court
15
GRANTS the motion for extension of time and DENIES the motion to appoint counsel.
16
17
EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY
Previously, the Court granted Mr. Owens a 30-day extension of time, from December 10,
18
2017, to January 9, 2018, to complete discovery because he was being transferred to another
19
institution and would not have access to his legal materials during the transfer. Dkt. 17, 20. Mr.
20
Owens now requests an additional extension of time, stating that he has not received his legal
21
materials at his new facility. Dkt. 21. Defendants have responded stating that they do not oppose
22
an extension of time for 30 days. Dkt. 24. The Court GRANTS the motion (Dkt. 21) and
23
ORDERS as follows:
24
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE
DISCOVERY AND DENYING MOTION TO
APPOINT OF COUNSEL - 1
25
1
1.
2
3
4
The deadline to complete discovery is extended from January 9, 2018 to
February 8, 2018.
2.
The deadline to file and serve dispositive motions is extended from February 8,
2018 to March 12, 2018.
5
MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL
6
The Court previously denied Mr. Owens’s two motions to appoint counsel without
7
prejudice. Dkt. 15. Mr. Owens has renewed his request for appointment of counsel. Dkt. 22. As
8
the Court noted before, generally, a person has no right to counsel in a civil action. See Campbell
9
v. Burt, 141 F.3d 927, 931 (9th Cir. 1998). The Court may appoint counsel for indigent civil
10
litigants under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), but only under “exceptional circumstances.” Agyeman v.
11
Corrections Corp. of Am., 390 F.3d 1101, 1103 (9th Cir. 2004). When determining whether
12
“exceptional circumstances” exist, the Court considers “the likelihood of success on the merits as
13
well as the ability of the [plaintiff] to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the
14
legal issues involved.” Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court finds
15
that, as with his first two requests, Mr. Owens has not presented exceptional circumstances that
16
would justify the appointment of counsel at this early stage of the litigation. Accordingly, the
17
Court DENIES Mr. Owens’s motion to appoint counsel (Dkt. 22) without prejudice.
18
The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to Mr. Owens.
19
DATED this 18th day of December, 2017.
20
A
21
BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA
United States Magistrate Judge
22
23
24
25
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE
DISCOVERY AND DENYING MOTION TO
APPOINT OF COUNSEL - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?