Spruel v. King County et al
Filing
10
MINUTE ORDER denying Plaintiff's 9 Motion for Order. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (PM)
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
MICHELLE SPRUEL,
10
Plaintiff,
MINUTE ORDER
v.
11
12
CASE NO. C17-1095-JCC
KING COUNTY, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
16
17
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C.
Coughenour, United States District Judge:
This matter comes before the Court on pro se Plaintiff Michelle Spruel’s Proposed
18
Motion for Order (Dkt. No. 9). It appears Plaintiff is making a motion to seal, and the Court
19
treats it as such. (See id.) However, Plaintiff does not identify which documents should be sealed
20
and why. Stating “the documents of the case” is insufficient. (Dkt. No. 9-1.) Further, the motion
21
states “Defendant, appearing ex parte, moves that the documents referenced below be placed
22
under court seal.” (Dkt. No. 9-3.) Plaintiff then signs as “Attorney for Defendant.” (Id.) Plaintiff
23
has not given the Court enough information to make a decision, and filed a motion as the wrong
24
party. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Proposed Motion for Order (Dkt. No. 9) is DENIED.
25
//
26
//
MINUTE ORDER C17-1095-JCC
PAGE - 1
1
DATED this 11th day of August 2017.
2
William M. McCool
Clerk of Court
3
/s/Paula McNabb
Deputy Clerk
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
MINUTE ORDER C17-1095-JCC
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?