Cale v. United States of America

Filing 24

ORDER striking Plaintiff's 22 Motion to Set Trial Schedule. Parties are directed to comply with the Court's orders and file a Joint Status Report by November 3, 2017. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 EDWARD CALE, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 CASE NO. C17-1099 MJP ORDER STRIKING MOTION TO SET TRIAL SCHEDULE v. NAVDEEP DHALIWAL, et al., Defendants. 15 16 17 18 The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s “Motion to Set Trial Schedule” (Dkt. No. 22), which Plaintiff describes as a “motion to extend this case.” Id. at 1. Because the parties have not even filed a Joint Status Report yet, there is no case 19 schedule in place. Plaintiff is directed to review the Order Regarding Initial Disclosures and 20 Joint Status Report (Dkt. No. 10) and the minute order directing the parties to file their Joint 21 Status Report by November 3, 2017 (Dkt. No. 21). It is the filing of the Joint Status Report 22 which will determine the trial date and case schedule in this matter; the Court will make no other 23 orders regarding the case schedule until receipt of the Joint Status Report. Therefore, 24 ORDER STRIKING MOTION TO SET TRIAL SCHEDULE - 1 1 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Motion to Set Trial Schedule” is STRICKEN. 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are to comply with the Court’s orders and 3 file a Joint Status Report by November 3, 2017. Failure to do so may result in sanctions up to 4 and including dismissal of the action. 5 6 The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to Plaintiff and to all counsel. 7 Dated: October 31, 2017. 8 9 10 A Marsha J. Pechman United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER STRIKING MOTION TO SET TRIAL SCHEDULE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?