Syria v. AllianceOne Receivables Management Inc et al
Filing
37
MINUTE ORDER RE-NOTING plaintiff's 36 MOTION for Reconsideration; Noting Date 11/10/2017, authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
DANA SYRIA, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
9
Plaintiff,
10
C17-1139 TSZ
v.
11
12
ALLIANCEONE RECEIVABLES
MANAGEMENT, INC.; and
TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, INC.,
MINUTE ORDER
13
Defendants.
14
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
15 Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge:
16
17
18
19
20
21
(1)
The motion for reconsideration, docket no. 36, brought by plaintiff Dana
Syria and defendant Transworld Systems, Inc. (“TSI”), is RENOTED to November 10,
2017. Any response and the movants’ reply shall be due in accordance with Local Civil
Rule 7(d)(3). See Local Civil Rule 7(h)(3). In the movants’ reply, the following issues
shall be addressed: (i) how many individuals are in the class with which TSI proposes to
settle; (ii) what amount is each class member projected to receive from the proposed
settlement and how is each class member’s share calculated; (iii) what, if anything,
prevents TSI from making, in advance of any approved class settlement, prospective
adjustments to the fees and/or interest it charges in connection with collecting debts owed
to the King County District Court; and (iv) if the Ninth Circuit reverses the state court’s
class certification order, would such decision also unwind any state court order approving
a class settlement.
22
23
MINUTE ORDER - 1
1
(2)
record.
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of
2
Dated this 27th day of October, 2017.
3
William M. McCool
Clerk
4
5
s/Karen Dews
Deputy Clerk
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
MINUTE ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?