Ironburg Inventions Ltd. v. Valve Corporation
Filing
285
ORDER granting plaintiff's 268 Motion to Seal, signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. (SWT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
IRONBURG INVENTIONS LTD., a
United Kingdom Limited Company,
10
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
Case No. C17-1182-TSZ
ORDER GRANTING IRONBURG’s
MOTION TO SEAL
v.
VALVE CORPORATION, a Washington
corporation,
14
Defendant.
15
16
This matter comes before the Court upon plaintiff Ironburg Inventions Ltd.
17
(“Ironburg”)’s unopposed motion to seal two documents pursuant to the parties’ Stipulated
18
Protective Order. Dkt. 268. Specifically, plaintiff moves pursuant to LCR 5(g) to maintain the
19
20
21
22
Rebuttal Expert Report of Ambreen Salters (“Salters Report”), and a spreadsheet related to the
buyout of Ironburg’s co-founder Simon Burgess, under seal because they contain confidential
business information and have been designated for “ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.” Dkt. 268.
23
To date, Valve Corporation (“Valve”) has not opposed plaintiff’s motion. See Dkt. 269 (Wanger
24
Decl.) at ¶ 2 (expressing counsel’s understanding that both parties agree the documents are
25
confidential).
26
ORDER
PAGE - 1
1
Having reviewed the motion, as well as the declaration of Christopher Wanger, the Court
2
finds that these documents contain confidential competitive information that properly falls within
3
the scope of the protective order. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to seal, Dkt. 268, is
4
GRANTED.
5
6
DATED this 19th day of October, 2018.
A
7
8
JAMES P. DONOHUE
United States Magistrate Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?