Puget Soundkeeper Alliance et al v. Cargill Inc

Filing 8

ORDER per 7 Stipulation, Defendant Cargill Inc. is granted an additional 21 days to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's complaint. Responsive pleading due 10/31/2017. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (PM)

Download PDF
1 The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE, 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 Case No.: 2:17-cv-01188-RSL CARGILL, INC. ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 13 14 Defendant 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 This matter, having come before the Court on the Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to the Complaint (the “Stipulation”) and the Court being duly advised and having examined the case records and files: The Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 1. Defendant Cargill, Inc. (“Cargill”) is GRANTED an additional 21 days to file its responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Cargill’s responsive pleading is now due on October 31, 2017. Dated this 17th day of October, 2017. 24 A Robert S. Lasnik 25 26 United States District Judge  27 ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT –1– 1 Presented by: 2 MARTEN LAW, PLLC 3 s/ Jeff B. Kray s/ Sarah J. Wightman Jeff B. Kray, WSBA No. 22174 Sarah J. Wightman, WSBA No. 51526 1191 Second Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: 206-292-2600 Fax: 206-292-2601 Email: jkray@martenlaw.com swightman@martenlaw.com Attorneys for Defendant Cargill, Inc. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SMITH AND LOWNEY, PLLC 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 s/ Richard Smith s/ Katherine Brennan Richard Smith, WSBA No. 21788 Katherine Brennan, WSBA No. 51247 2317 E. John St. Seattle, WA 98112 Phone: 206-860-2883 Fax: 206-860-4187 Email: richard@smithandlowney.com katherine@smithandlowney.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Puget Soundkeeper Alliance 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT –2–

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?