Puget Soundkeeper Alliance et al v. Cargill Inc
Filing
8
ORDER per 7 Stipulation, Defendant Cargill Inc. is granted an additional 21 days to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's complaint. Responsive pleading due 10/31/2017. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (PM)
1
The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE,
10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
Case No.: 2:17-cv-01188-RSL
CARGILL, INC.
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
13
14
Defendant
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
This matter, having come before the Court on the Stipulation Extending Time to Respond
to the Complaint (the “Stipulation”) and the Court being duly advised and having examined the
case records and files:
The Court hereby ORDERS as follows:
1.
Defendant Cargill, Inc. (“Cargill”) is GRANTED an additional 21 days to
file its responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Cargill’s responsive
pleading is now due on October 31, 2017.
Dated this 17th day of October, 2017.
24
A
Robert S. Lasnik
25
26
United States District Judge
27
ORDER EXTENDING
TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
–1–
1
Presented by:
2
MARTEN LAW, PLLC
3
s/ Jeff B. Kray
s/ Sarah J. Wightman
Jeff B. Kray, WSBA No. 22174
Sarah J. Wightman, WSBA No. 51526
1191 Second Avenue, Suite 2200
Seattle, WA 98101
Phone: 206-292-2600
Fax: 206-292-2601
Email: jkray@martenlaw.com
swightman@martenlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendant Cargill, Inc.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
SMITH AND LOWNEY, PLLC
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
s/ Richard Smith
s/ Katherine Brennan
Richard Smith, WSBA No. 21788
Katherine Brennan, WSBA No. 51247
2317 E. John St.
Seattle, WA 98112
Phone: 206-860-2883
Fax: 206-860-4187
Email: richard@smithandlowney.com
katherine@smithandlowney.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Puget Soundkeeper Alliance
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
ORDER EXTENDING
TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
–2–
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?