POW Nevada, LLC v. Doe 1 et al

Filing 14

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 12 Motion for Extension of the Initial Scheduling Dates. FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 11/17/2017, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 12/1/2017, Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan due by 12/1/2017, signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 11 POW NEVADA, LLC, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 DOE 1, et al., Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. C17-1213 RSM ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF THE INITIAL SCHEDULING DATES 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Initial Scheduling Dates. 18 19 20 (Dkt. #12). Because the dates set out in the Court’s current Order Regarding Initial Disclosures, Joint Status Report, and Early Settlement (Dkt. #9), do not provide Plaintiff with enough time to 21 identify and serve the Doe Defendants, do not provide the Doe Defendants with enough time to 22 appear, and do not provide the parties enough time to conduct the required Rule 26(f) conference, 23 the Court finds good cause to grant a reasonable extension of the initial scheduling dates. 24 Plaintiffs’ Motion (Dkt. #12) is accordingly GRANTED. 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF THE INITIAL SCHEDULING DATES - 1 1 The initial scheduling dates are reset as follows: 2 3 4 5 6 Deadline for FRCP 26(f) Conference Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1) Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan as Required by FRCP 26(f) and Local Civil Rule 26(f) Original Date 9/20/2017 9/27/2017 10/4/2017 Revised Date 11/17/2017 12/1/2017 12/1/2017 7 8 DATED this 21st day of September 2017. 9 10 11 12 A RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF THE INITIAL SCHEDULING DATES - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?