ME2 Productions Inc v. Doe 1 et al
Filing
31
ORDER granting plaintiff's 29 Motion to Permit Alternative Service, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(SWT)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC.,
8
9
10
11
Plaintiff,
Case No. C17-1220RSL
v.
DAVID MATENDO, et al.,
ORDER PERMITTING SERVICE
BY MAIL
Defendants.
12
13
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s “Motion to Permit Alternative
14
Mail Service” on defendant John Chu. Dkt. # 19. Federal Rule of Procedure 4(e)(1)
15
allows plaintiff to effect service “pursuant to the law of the state in which the district is
16
located.” Washington law authorizes service by mail upon a showing that (a) defendant
17
has made reasonably diligent efforts at personal service (Rodriguez v. James-Jackson,
18
127 Wn. App. 139, 140 (2005)), and (b) defendant resides in the state but has concealed
19
herself in order to avoid service of process (RCW 4.28.100(4)).
20
Plaintiff has made multiple unsuccessful attempts to personally serve Mr. Chu.
21
There is evidence that the named defendant resides at, or is associated with, the address
22
identified by the ISP and used by the process server. In addition, inhabitants of the
23
apartment have repeatedly declined to respond to the door and it appears that Mr. Chu is
24
actively avoiding service. All of the prerequisites for allowing service by mail are
25
therefore satisfied, and there is reason to believe that service by mail will effectively
26
ORDER PERMITTING SERVICE
BY MAIL - 1
1
notify defendant of the claims against him.
2
3
Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff may, therefore, accomplish service by
4
depositing copies of the summons, complaint, and this Order in the United States Post
5
Office directed to defendant Chu at his address.
6
7
Dated this 11th day of December, 2017.
8
A
9
Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER PERMITTING SERVICE
BY MAIL - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?