Herbert v. King County et al

Filing 8

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with recommendation to review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (PM) cc: plaintiff via first class mail

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 ANTHONY G. HERBERT, Plaintiff, 9 10 11 CASE NO. C17-1246-JLR v. ORDER RE: APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS KING COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). (Dkt. 6.) Because 14 plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $400.00 filing fee, he financially 15 qualifies for IFP status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Therefore, plaintiff’s IFP application 16 (Dkt. 6) is GRANTED. However, the undersigned recommends review under 28 U.S.C. § 17 1915(e)(2)(B). The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff and to 18 the assigned District Judge. 19 DATED this 3rd day of October, 2017. 20 A 21 Mary Alice Theiler United States Magistrate Judge 22 23 ORDER PAGE - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?