United States of America v. Yin et al

Filing 12

ORDER granting 11 Motion for Extension of Time signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. Clerk to renote 7 Motion to Issue Continuing Garnishee Order for 9/29/17 and give this matter a civil action number. Case assigned to Hon. James Robart, case number 17-cv-1284-JLR. (cc: defendant)(ST)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 _______________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) JOHN YIN, ) ) Defendant/Judgment Debtor, ) ) v. ) ) T. ROWE PRICE, ) ) Garnishee. ) _______________________________________) Case No. MC17-0059RSL ORDER 16 This matter comes before the Court on defendant/judgment debtor’s request for a hearing 17 (Dkt. # 9-1) and request for an extension of time (Dkt. # 11).1 The request for extension of time 18 in GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to renote plaintiff’s “Motion to Issue Continuing 19 Garnishee Order” (Dkt. # 7) on the Court’s calendar for September 29, 2017. 20 21 22 1 23 24 25 26 The request for an extension of time was filed by the judgment debtor, acting pro se, despite the fact that Kirk C. Davis has appeared as his attorney in this matter. The Court has considered both filings, but Mr. Yin is advised that “[w]hen a party is represented by an attorney of record in a case, the party cannot appear or act on his or her own behalf in that case, or take any step therein, until after the party requests by motion to proceed on his or her own behalf, certifies in the motion that he or she has provided copies of the motion to his or her current counsel and to the opposing party, and is granted an order of substitution by the court terminating the party’s attorney as counsel and substituting the party in to proceed pro se . . . .” LCR 83.2. ORDER In light of defendant/judgment debtor’s objections and request for hearing, the Clerk of 1 2 Court is also directed to give this matter a civil action number and assign it in rotation. The Writ 3 of Garnishment shall remain in effect during the pendency of this action, but judgment shall not 4 be entered absent further order of the Court. 5 Dated this 24th day of August, 2017. 6 7 A 8 Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?