Amazon.com, Inc et al v. Uniloc USA, Inc et al

Filing 30

MINUTE ORDER RE-NOTING Defendants Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A.'S 18 MOTION to dismiss, transfer or stay. Noting Date is 3/2/2018. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 AMAZON.COM, INC., et al., 11 Plaintiffs, CASE NO. C17-1307JLR MINUTE ORDER v. 12 13 UNILOC USA, INC., et al., Defendants. 14 15 16 17 The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable James L. Robart: On October 19, 2017, Defendants Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. 18 (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a motion to dismiss, transfer, or stay in this court 19 because of a similar case filed in the Eastern District of Texas. (See MTD (Dkt. # 18) at 20 1-3 (citing Uniloc USA, Inc., et al. v. RingCentral, Inc., No. 2-17-cv-00354 (E.D. Tex.)).) 21 In light of Defendants’ motion and a pending motion to transfer in the Eastern District of 22 Texas case, the court delayed issuing an order regarding initial disclosures and a joint MINUTE ORDER - 1 1 status report. (12/8/17 Order (Dkt. # 27) (citing Fed R. Civ. P. 16(b)(2) and Local Rules 2 W.D. Wash. LCR 16(a)).) On February 5, 2018, Defendants filed a motion to stay 3 pending the inter-parts review of the patents-in-suit. (MTS (Dkt. # 29).) Defendants’ 4 motion to stay is noted for Friday, March 2, 2018. (Id. at 1.) The court therefore 5 DIRECTS the Clerk to RE-NOTE the motion to dismiss, transfer, or stay (Dkt. # 18) for 6 Friday, March 2, 2018, to coincide with the court’s consideration of Defendants’ motion 7 to stay (Dkt. # 29). 8 Filed and entered this 12th day of February, 2018. 9 WILLIAM M. MCCOOL Clerk of Court 10 s/ Ashleigh Drecktrah Deputy Clerk 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 MINUTE ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?