XPO Logistics, Inc et al v. Thomas

Filing 32

ORDER granting plaintiffs' 30 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Counterclaims, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Defendant via USPS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 10 11 XPO LOGISTICS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Case No. C17-1346RSL ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME v. THOMAS MICHAJLA, Defendant. This matter comes before the Court on “Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant’s Counterclaims.” Dkt. # 30. Defendant’s attorney has recently withdrawn and plaintiffs assert that they seek to confer with defendant directly in order to narrow the scope of their response and of a forthcoming motion to dismiss. The Court finds there is good cause for an extension of time. Plaintiffs’ motion is accordingly GRANTED, and the deadline by which plaintiffs must respond to defendant’s counterclaims is extended until Friday, December 15, 2017. 23 24 DATED this 6th day of December, 2017. 25 A Robert S. Lasnik 26 27 United States District Judge 28 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?