XPO Logistics, Inc et al v. Thomas

Filing 32

ORDER granting plaintiffs' 30 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Counterclaims, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Defendant via USPS)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

7
8
9
10
11

XPO LOGISTICS, INC., a Delaware
corporation, and XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT,
INC., a Delaware corporation,
Plaintiffs,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Case No. C17-1346RSL
ORDER GRANTING
EXTENSION OF TIME

v.
THOMAS MICHAJLA,
Defendant.
This matter comes before the Court on “Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of
Time to Respond to Defendant’s Counterclaims.” Dkt. # 30. Defendant’s attorney has recently
withdrawn and plaintiffs assert that they seek to confer with defendant directly in order to
narrow the scope of their response and of a forthcoming motion to dismiss. The Court finds
there is good cause for an extension of time. Plaintiffs’ motion is accordingly GRANTED, and
the deadline by which plaintiffs must respond to defendant’s counterclaims is extended until
Friday, December 15, 2017.

23
24

DATED this 6th day of December, 2017.

25

A
Robert S. Lasnik

26
27

United States District Judge

28
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME - 1