Sanchez v. Duke

Filing 85

MINUTE ORDER granting in part, denying in part, and deferring in part plaintiff's 74 MOTION IN LIMINE; denying in part and deferring in part defendant's 72 MOTION IN LIMINE; deferring defendant's 73 MOTION To Excuse Potential Jurors From Viewing The "Unconscious Bias" Video. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 JENNIFER SANCHEZ, 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 C17-1353 TSZ KEVIN K. McALEENAN, Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 1 11 12 Defendant. 13 14 15 16 MINUTE ORDER The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: (1) Plaintiff’s motion in limine, docket no. 74, is GRANTED in part, DENIED in part, and DEFERRED in part as follows: 1. Motion to exclude evidence not disclosed prior to close of discovery is DEFERRED and the parties should be prepared to identify any such evidence at the Pretrial Conference; 2. 17 Motion to exclude evidence of discipline imposed against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) agents after plaintiff initiated this lawsuit is DEFERRED to the Pretrial Conference; 18 19 20 21 1 The Clerk is DIRECTED to correct the docket to reflect the correct spelling of the Acting 22 Secretary’s last name. 23 MINUTE ORDER - 1 1 3. Motion to exclude reference to related administrative decisions including those made by the Merit Systems Protection Board and/or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is GRANTED; 4. Motion to exclude evidence related to any driving under the influence (“DUI”) allegations and/or DUI-related charges against plaintiff prior to March 18, 2014, is DENIED; 5. Motion to exclude untimely disclosed expert opinions of William Partin contained in his supplemental report is DENIED; motion to exclude testimony beyond the scope of the individual’s expertise is DEFERRED to trial; 6. Stipulated motion to exclude the testimony of Melissa Tillet, any reference to statements made by Tillett, and any documents produced by or obtained from Tillett is GRANTED; 7. Stipulated motion to exclude the testimony of Yakima Police Officer Ryan Urlacher is DEFERRED to the Pretrial Conference; 8. Stipulated motion to limit evidence concerning plaintiff’s prior termination and related lawsuit is DEFERRED to the Pretrial Conference; and 9. Stipulated motion to exclude any witness not disclosed in discovery is GRANTED. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 (2) Defendant’s motion in limine, docket no. 72, is DENIED in part and DEFERRED in part as follows: A. Motion to exclude unfavorable evidence regarding Yakima Police Officer Ryan Urlacher is DENIED; B. Motion to exclude the expert report and testimony of Thomas Missell is DENIED; C. Motion to exclude testimony in support of plaintiff’s character is DENIED; D. Motion to exclude allegations about other employees that are cumulative or lack foundation is DEFERRED to the Pretrial Conference; E. Motion to exclude irrelevant testimony about alleged comparators is DEFERRED to the Pretrial Conference; at the Pretrial Conference, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 MINUTE ORDER - 2 1 plaintiff shall produce proposed exhibits 129 and 130 for the Court’s review; and 2 F. 3 Motion to exclude evidence regarding discrete employment actions against plaintiff by other decision makers is DEFERRED to the Pretrial Conference. 4 (3) Defendant’s motion to excuse potential jurors from viewing “unconscious 5 bias” video, docket no. 73, is DEFERRED to the Pretrial Conference. (4) 6 record. 7 The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of Dated this 11th day of September, 2019. 8 William M. McCool Clerk 9 10 s/Karen Dews Deputy Clerk 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 MINUTE ORDER - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?