Mays v. Bishop et al

Filing 15

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: consolidation of case with 16-cv-1069 RSM. Parties Responses due no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

8
9
10

DAVID E. MAYS, Derivatively on Behalf of
Nominal Defendant JUNO THERAPEUTICS,
INC.,

11
12
13
14

CASE NO. C17-1356 RSM
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff,
v.
HANS E. BISHOP, et al.,
Defendants.

15
16

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On September 8, 2017, Plaintiff David

17 E. Mays filed a Cover Sheet listing as a related case In re Juno Therapeutics, Inc., Case No. 1618 cv-1069-RSM. Dkt. #1-1. The Court has examined the Complaint in this case and the related
19 case and believes there is cause to consolidate these matters under Case No. 16-cv-1069-RSM.
20

In response to this Order, Plaintiff and Defendants must each write a short and plain

21 statement telling the Court: (1) why this case should not be consolidated with Case No. 16-cv22 1069-RSM; (2) if this case should not be consolidated, how it can proceed parallel to Case No.
23 16-cv-1069-RSM; (3) why Plaintiff is not a member of the class in Case No. 16-cv-1069-RSM
24
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

and therefore subject to the restrictions discussed in Case No. 16-cv-1069-RSM, Dkt. #40.
Each Response may not exceed six (6) double-spaced pages. Defendants may submit one
collective Response. The Court will take no further action in this case until the parties have
submitted these Responses.
Accordingly, the Court hereby finds and ORDERS that the parties shall file Responses
to this Order to Show Cause containing the detail above no later than fourteen (14) days
from the date of this Order.

8
9

DATED this 20 day of November, 2017.

10

A

11

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 2