Mays v. Bishop et al

Filing 15

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: consolidation of case with 16-cv-1069 RSM. Parties Responses due no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 DAVID E. MAYS, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant JUNO THERAPEUTICS, INC., 11 12 13 14 CASE NO. C17-1356 RSM ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Plaintiff, v. HANS E. BISHOP, et al., Defendants. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On September 8, 2017, Plaintiff David 17 E. Mays filed a Cover Sheet listing as a related case In re Juno Therapeutics, Inc., Case No. 1618 cv-1069-RSM. Dkt. #1-1. The Court has examined the Complaint in this case and the related 19 case and believes there is cause to consolidate these matters under Case No. 16-cv-1069-RSM. 20 In response to this Order, Plaintiff and Defendants must each write a short and plain 21 statement telling the Court: (1) why this case should not be consolidated with Case No. 16-cv22 1069-RSM; (2) if this case should not be consolidated, how it can proceed parallel to Case No. 23 16-cv-1069-RSM; (3) why Plaintiff is not a member of the class in Case No. 16-cv-1069-RSM 24 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 and therefore subject to the restrictions discussed in Case No. 16-cv-1069-RSM, Dkt. #40. Each Response may not exceed six (6) double-spaced pages. Defendants may submit one collective Response. The Court will take no further action in this case until the parties have submitted these Responses. Accordingly, the Court hereby finds and ORDERS that the parties shall file Responses to this Order to Show Cause containing the detail above no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. 8 9 DATED this 20 day of November, 2017. 10 A 11 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?