Edge et al v. City of Everett

Filing 7

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE; Motion for preliminary injunction due 9/21/17; response due 10/23/17; reply/noting date 11/3/17. Oral Argument on the motion for preliminary injunction set for 11/21/2017 at 10:00 AM. City's answer due by 10/30/17 by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (RS)

Download PDF
1 Honorable Marsha Pechman 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 JOVANNA EDGE, an individual; LEAH HUMPHREY, an individual; LIBERTY ZISKA, an individual; AMELIA POWELL, an individual; NATALIE BJERKE, an individual; BRITTANY GIAZZI, an individual; JUANITA CASTANEDA GUERRERO, an individual; and MATTESON HERNANDEZ, an individual, No. 2:17-cv-01361 STIPULATION AND AGREED ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE 14 Plaintiffs, 15 16 17 v. CITY OF EVERETT, a Washington Municipal Corporation, 18 Defendant. 19 STIPULATION 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 The parties hereto, by and through their respective counsel, have conferred regarding an agreed briefing schedule on a Motion for Preliminary Injunction the Plaintiffs have stated they will file. The parties propose the following due dates: Motion for Preliminary Injunction Thursday, September 21, 2017 City’s Response to Motion Monday, October 23, 2017 Plaintiffs’ Reply (noting date) Friday, November 3, 2017 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED AGREED ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE - 1 Cause No. 2:17-cv-01361 20061 00005 gi14dd17t1 PACIFICA LAW GROUP LLP 1191 SECOND AVENUE SUITE 2000 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-3404 TELEPHONE: (206) 245.1700 FACSIMILE: (206) 245.1750 1 2 The parties respectfully request that the Court set a date for oral argument of the motion as soon as reasonably possible following the noting date. 3 4 The parties agree that they have conducted an initial conference regarding discovery and that the parties may conduct discovery with respect to this motion. 5 6 The parties also agree, in light of the injunction proceedings, to extend the date to answer the complaint until October 30, 2017. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 This stipulation is entered solely for the purpose of facilitating prompt and efficient briefing and consideration of Plaintiffs’ motion for the benefit of the Court and the parties without the need for emergency motions practice. As part of this stipulation, the City will voluntarily refrain from enforcement of Ordinance 3560-17 and the amendments in section 1 of Ordinance 3559-17 until after this Court rules on the Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Nothing in this stipulation will be construed as evidence of or an admission that any of Plaintiffs’ claims do or do not have merit, and no party may cite to this stipulation in aid of or in opposition to any request for substantive relief, including any relief requested in the Motion for Preliminary Injunction. 16 17 The parties, therefore, now stipulate to the foregoing and request that the Court enter the Order subjoined hereto. 18 DATED this 15th day of September, 2017. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NEWMAN DU WORS LLP PACIFICA LAW GROUP LLP By By s/ Matthew J. Segal Matthew J. Segal, WSBA #29797 s/Derek A. Newman Derek A. Newman, WSBA #26967 Jessica V. Newman, WSBA #28080 Keith Scully, WSBA #28677 Jason B. Sykes, WSBA #44369 CITY OF EVERETT Ramsey Ramerman, WSBA #30423 Attorneys for Defendant City of Everett Attorneys for Plaintiffs 26 27 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED AGREED ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE - 2 Cause No. 2:17-cv-01361 20061 00005 gi14dd17t1 PACIFICA LAW GROUP LLP 1191 SECOND AVENUE SUITE 2000 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-3404 TELEPHONE: (206) 245.1700 FACSIMILE: (206) 245.1750 ORDER 1 2 Based on the foregoing stipulation of the parties, the Court hereby ORDERS that the 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction shall be subject to the following agreed briefing schedule: 4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction 5 6 Thursday, September 21, 2017 City’s Response to Motion Monday, October 23, 2017 Plaintiffs’ Reply (noting date) Friday, November 3, 2017 7 The Court sets oral argument on the motion for preliminary injunction for November 21, 8 2017, at 10:00 a.m. The parties are allowed twenty minutes for argument, including rebuttal. 9 The parties may conduct discovery pursuant to their agreement. 10 The City shall file an answer to the complaint by October 30, 2017. 11 DATED this 18th day of September, 2017. 12 13 14 A 15 16 Marsha J. Pechman United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 Jointly Presented by: PACIFICA LAW GROUP LLP 22 By /s/ Matthew J. Segal Matthew J. Segal, WSBA #29797 23 Attorneys for Defendant City of Everett 24 25 CITY OF EVERETT Ramsey Ramerman, WSBA #30423 26 27 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED AGREED ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE - 3 Cause No. 2:17-cv-01361 20061 00005 gi14dd17t1 PACIFICA LAW GROUP LLP 1191 SECOND AVENUE SUITE 2000 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-3404 TELEPHONE: (206) 245.1700 FACSIMILE: (206) 245.1750 1 2 NEWMAN DU WORS LLP 3 By __/s/__ Derek A. Newman ______ Derek A. Newman, WSBA #26967 Jessica V. Newman, WSBA #28080 Keith Scully, WSBA #28677 Jason B. Sykes, WSBA #44369 4 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED AGREED ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE - 4 Cause No. 2:17-cv-01361 20061 00005 gi14dd17t1 PACIFICA LAW GROUP LLP 1191 SECOND AVENUE SUITE 2000 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-3404 TELEPHONE: (206) 245.1700 FACSIMILE: (206) 245.1750

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?