Crofts et al v. Issaquah School District et al
Filing
63
ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 62 Motion to Withdraw as Co-Counsel construed as a Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Jeremy Sanders's Claims. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (SWT) (Jeremy Sanders terminated.) (cc: Jeremy Sanders via USPS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
LAYNA CROFTS,
10
CASE NO. C17-1365JLR
Plaintiff,
11
ORDER
v.
12
ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT,
13
Defendant.
14
The court is in receipt of pro se Plaintiffs Layna Crofts and Jeremy Sanders’s
15
16
(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) motion for permission for Mr. Sanders “to withdraw as
17
co-counsel.” (Mot. (Dkt. # 62).) Because Mr. Sanders represents himself pro se, he
18
cannot serve as “co-counsel” for Ms. Crofts. See, e.g., Simon v. Hartford Life, Inc., 546
19
F.3d 661, 664 (9th Cir. 2008) (“It is well established that the privilege to represent
20
oneself pro se . . . is personal to the litigant and does not extend to other parties or
21
entities.”). By the same logic, Ms. Crofts cannot serve as counsel for Mr. Sanders. See
22
id.
ORDER - 1
1
The court thus construes Plaintiffs’ motion as a motion to voluntarily dismiss Mr.
2
Sanders’s claims. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) provides that, after the
3
opposing party has filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment, a plaintiff may
4
dismiss an action by court order, on terms that the court considers proper. Fed. R. Civ. P.
5
41(a)(2). Here, the court finds dismissal of Mr. Sanders’ claims appropriate. Ms. Crofts’
6
claims remain.
7
Accordingly, the court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion for permission for Mr. Sanders
8
“to withdraw as co-counsel,” which the court construes as a motion to voluntarily dismiss
9
Mr. Sanders’s claims. (Dkt. # 62.) The court DIRECTS the Clerk to terminate Mr.
10
11
Sanders as a plaintiff in this action.
Dated this 29th day of March, 2019.
12
13
A
14
The Honorable James L. Robart
U.S. District Court Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?