Asko Processing, Inc v. Kibble & Prentice Holding Company et al
Filing
46
ORDER OF DISMISSAL re parties' 45 Stipulation; this matter is dismissed with prejudice and without costs, by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
10
ASKO PROCESSING, INC., a Washington
corporation,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
v.
KIBBLE & PRENTICE HOLDING
COMPANY, a Washington company; and
CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY OF
AMERICA, a foreign company,
15
Defendants.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. C17-1393 RSM
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
17
The parties having stipulated that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Citizens Insurance
18
Company of America in the above-entitled matter be dismissed with prejudice and without
19
additional fees, costs, or payments of any other sums of any kind or description; and the Court
20
being fully advised in the premises; now, therefore,
21
22
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled matter be and the same is dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
DATED this 10th day of May 2018.
A
24
25
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
26
27
ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 1
NO. 2:17-CV-01393-RSM
130369.0001/7289318.1
LANE POWELL PC
1420 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 4200
P.O. BOX 91302
SEATTLE, WA 98111-9402
206.223.7000 FAX: 206.223.7107
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Presented by:
LANE POWELL PC
By s/Charles C. Huber
Charles C. Huber, WSBA No. 18941
Katie Bass, WSBA No. 51369
Attorneys for Defendant
MILLS MEYERS SWARTLING P.S.
By s/Kasey Huebner per email authorization
Bruce Winchell, WSBA No. 14582
Kasey D. Huebner, WSBA No. 32890
Attorneys for Plaintiff
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 2
NO. 2:17-CV-01393-RSM
130369.0001/7289318.1
LANE POWELL PC
1420 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 4200
P.O. BOX 91302
SEATTLE, WA 98111-9402
206.223.7000 FAX: 206.223.7107
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?