Wells Fargo Insurance Services USA, Inc v. Ogden et al

Filing 142

ORDER striking Defendants' 122 Motion in Limine, with leave to renew; striking Plaintiff's 124 Motion in Limine, with leave to renew. Signed by Judge Stanley A. Bastian.(MW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 9 USI INSURANCE SERVICES 10 NATIONAL, INC., formerly known as NO. 2:17-cv-01394-SAB 11 WELLS FARGO INSURANCE 12 SERVICES USA, INC., 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. ORDER STRIKING 15 STANLEY OGDEN, an individual; MOTIONS IN LIMINE WITH 16 MARCIA OGDEN, an individual; LEAVE TO RENEW 17 ELENOR O’KEEFE, an individual; 18 LEWIS DORRINGTON, an individual; 19 JOHN HASKELL, JR., an individual; 20 MARY MARK, an individual; CORY 21 ANDERSON, an individual; and ABD 22 INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL 23 SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation, 24 Defendants. 25 26 Currently, there are pending Motions in Limine that were filed prior to 27 Judge Lasnik issuing his ruling on the parties’ Motions for Summary Judgment. 28 ECF No. 122, 124. Recently, the Court issued a new Scheduling Order that sets ORDER STRIKING MOTIONS IN LIMINE WITH LEAVE TO RENEW ~ 1 1 forth new deadlines for filing Motions in Limine. ECF No. 141. For docket 2 management purposes, the Court will strike the pending Motions with leave to 3 renew. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 5 1. Defendants’ Motions in Limine to Exclude Testimony and Reports of 6 USI’s Experts, ECF No. 122, is STRICKEN, with leave to renew. 7 8 9 2. Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine, ECF No. 124, is STRICKEN, with leave to renew. IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Clerk is hereby directed to enter 10 this Order and to provide copies to counsel. 11 12 DATED this 27th day of September, 13 14 15 16 17 18 Stanley A. Bastian United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER STRIKING MOTIONS IN LIMINE WITH LEAVE TO RENEW ~ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?