Wells Fargo Insurance Services USA, Inc v. Ogden et al
Filing
142
ORDER striking Defendants' 122 Motion in Limine, with leave to renew; striking Plaintiff's 124 Motion in Limine, with leave to renew. Signed by Judge Stanley A. Bastian.(MW)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
8
9 USI INSURANCE SERVICES
10 NATIONAL, INC., formerly known as
NO. 2:17-cv-01394-SAB
11 WELLS FARGO INSURANCE
12 SERVICES USA, INC.,
13
Plaintiff,
14 v.
ORDER STRIKING
15 STANLEY OGDEN, an individual;
MOTIONS IN LIMINE WITH
16 MARCIA OGDEN, an individual;
LEAVE TO RENEW
17 ELENOR O’KEEFE, an individual;
18 LEWIS DORRINGTON, an individual;
19 JOHN HASKELL, JR., an individual;
20 MARY MARK, an individual; CORY
21 ANDERSON, an individual; and ABD
22 INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL
23 SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation,
24
Defendants.
25
26
Currently, there are pending Motions in Limine that were filed prior to
27 Judge Lasnik issuing his ruling on the parties’ Motions for Summary Judgment.
28 ECF No. 122, 124. Recently, the Court issued a new Scheduling Order that sets
ORDER STRIKING MOTIONS IN LIMINE
WITH LEAVE TO RENEW ~ 1
1 forth new deadlines for filing Motions in Limine. ECF No. 141. For docket
2 management purposes, the Court will strike the pending Motions with leave to
3 renew.
4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
5
1. Defendants’ Motions in Limine to Exclude Testimony and Reports of
6
USI’s Experts, ECF No. 122, is STRICKEN, with leave to renew.
7
8
9
2. Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine, ECF No. 124, is STRICKEN, with leave
to renew.
IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Clerk is hereby directed to enter
10 this Order and to provide copies to counsel.
11
12
DATED this 27th day of September,
13
14
15
16
17
18
Stanley A. Bastian
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER STRIKING MOTIONS IN LIMINE
WITH LEAVE TO RENEW ~ 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?