Wells Fargo Insurance Services USA, Inc v. Ogden et al
Filing
202
ORDER granting Parties' 178 Joint Stipulated MOTION Regarding Motions in Limine. Signed by Judge Stanley A. Bastian. (SB)
Case 2:17-cv-01394-SAB Document 202 Filed 01/25/23 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
7
8 USI INSURANCE SERVICES NATIONAL,
9 INC., formerly known as WELLS FARGO
NO. 2:17-cv-01394-SAB
10 INSURANCE SERVICES USA, INC.,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
13 STANLEY OGDEN, et al.,
14
Defendants.
STIPULATION REGARDING
MOTIONS IN LIMNE
15
16
Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Stipulation Regarding Motions in
17 Limine, ECF No. 178. Plaintiff is represented by Thomas Holt, Megan Crowhurst,
18 and Anne Reuben. Defendants are represented by Christopher Banks, Molly
19 Terwilliger, Patrick Duffey, and Debra Fischer. The parties ask the Court to grant
20 their Joint Stipulation regarding certain motions in limine.
21
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:
22
1.
The parties’ Joint Stipulation Regarding Motions in Limine, ECF No.
23 178, is GRANTED.
24
2.
The Court grants the following Joint Motions in Limine:
25
a.
No party, witness, or counsel shall offer any evidence, testimony, or
26
argument regarding any other legal proceedings (including litigation and/or
27
arbitrations) involving any of the parties to this litigation. Notwithstanding
28
the foregoing, the parties may use sworn testimony from other legal
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION ~ 1
Case 2:17-cv-01394-SAB Document 202 Filed 01/25/23 Page 2 of 3
1
proceedings for purposes of impeachment, consistent with the Federal
2
Rules of Evidence and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties
3
reserve the right to raise objections to the use of sworn testimony from
4
other legal proceedings at the time that it is offered. To the extent testimony
5
from other legal proceedings is used for purposes of impeachment, the
6
parties shall not in the presence of the jury reference the name of the prior
7
legal proceeding, the parties involved, the underlying facts or legal claims
8
at issue in the proceeding, or any rulings of the court or other tribunal
9
involved in the proceeding.
10
b.
No party, counsel, or witness may offer evidence, testimony, or
11
argument pertaining to any alleged solicitation or promotion of solicitation
12
by defendant John Haskell of any WFIS employee other than Lewis
13
Dorrington to leave Wells Fargo Insurance Services and/or work at
14
defendant ABD Insurance Services.
15
c.
16
implicates the Stokes Lawrence law firm by name or reference in the
17
underlying events at issue in this litigation.
No counsel may offer argument or seek to elicit testimony that
18 //
19 //
20 //
21 //
22 //
23 //
24 //
25 //
26 //
27 //
28 //
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION ~ 2
Case 2:17-cv-01394-SAB Document 202 Filed 01/25/23 Page 3 of 3
1
d.
No party, witness, or counsel shall offer any evidence, testimony, or
2
argument regarding any obligation or alleged obligation defendant ABD
3
Insurance Services has, had, or may have to indemnify any of the individual
4
defendants against the claims asserted in this action.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Clerk is hereby directed to enter
6 this Order and to provide copies to counsel.
7
DATED this 25th day of January 2023.
8
9
10
11
12
_____________________________
Stanley A. Bastian
U.S. District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION ~ 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?