Harris v. Chief Counsel Pacific District North et al

Filing 10

MINUTE ORDER denying Plaintiff's 9 Second Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour.(TH) (cc: Plaintiff via U.S. Mail)

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

7
8
9

BENNY RAY HARRIS, SR,

10
11
12

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. C17-1405-JCC
MINUTE ORDER

v.
CHIEF COUNSEL PACIFIC
DISTRICT NORTH,

13
14

Defendant.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C.
Coughenour, United States District Judge:
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s second motion to appoint counsel (Dkt.
No. 9). The Court may appoint counsel “in such circumstances as the court may deem just.” 42
U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1); Bradshaw v. Zoological Soc’y of San Diego, 662 F.2d 1301, 1318 (9th
Cir. 1981) (discussing factors to be considered). The Court concludes justice does not require the
appointment of counsel. Plaintiff’s current motion (Dkt. No. 9) is DENIED.
DATED this 26th day of October 2017.
William M. McCool
Clerk of Court

24
25

s/Tomas Hernandez
Deputy Clerk

26

MINUTE ORDER C17-1405-JCC
PAGE - 1