Hardyal et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al

Filing 45

MINUTE ORDER re Plaintiffs' 35 MOTION for Summary Judgment; directing each party to file one supplemental brief, not to exceed ten (10) pages, on or before 7/6/2018; RENOTING the Motion to 7/6/2018; SETTING Oral Argument on the Motion for 7/20/2018 at 10:00 AM. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 TRACY HARDYAL, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, 9 C17-1416 TSZ v. 10 US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 11 MINUTE ORDER Defendant. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: (1) The Court has reviewed Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment, docket no. 35 (the “Motion”), and the corresponding papers. Each party is DIRECTED to file one supplemental brief, not to exceed ten (10) pages, on or before July 6, 2018, addressing: (a) whether any acceleration in 2008 was waived or abandoned as a result of the Forbearance Agreement and subsequent conduct, see Declaration of Sony Prudent in Support of Defendant’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment, docket no. 39, Exhibits 6–8; (b) whether the Court can rule on the waiver issue as a matter of law; (c) the application, if any, of Equitable Life Leasing Corp. v. Cedarbrook, Inc., 52 Wn. App. 497, 501–02 (1988); and (d) if the debt was accelerated in 2008 and subsequently waived, what is the legal effect, if any, of the subsequent waiver. The Motion is RENOTED to July 6, 2018. 20 21 (2) The Court SETS oral argument on the Motion for July 20, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. 22 23 MINUTE ORDER - 1 1 (3) record. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of 2 Dated this 27th day of June, 2018. 3 William M. McCool Clerk 4 5 s/Karen Dews Deputy Clerk 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 MINUTE ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?