Ramthun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 54

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: It having been reported to the Court on April 4, 2019, that the above cause has been settled, and no final order having yet been presented, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that this cause be and the same is hereby DISMISSED. This dismissal shall be without prejudice to the right of any party upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days hereof to reopen this cause if the reported settlement is not consummated. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (MW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 KATHY JO RAMTHUN, 10 11 12 13 Plaintiff, vs. WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al., NO. C17-1440RSL ORDER OF DISMISSAL Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 It having been reported to the Court on April 4, 2019, that the above cause has been settled, and no final order having yet been presented, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that this cause be and the same is hereby DISMISSED. This dismissal shall be without prejudice to the right of any party upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days hereof to reopen this cause if the reported settlement is not consummated. 20 21 DATED this 5th day of April, 2019. 22 23 A 24 Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?