Allen v. Catholic Social Services et al
Filing
7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE: IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice to re-file the claims in the proper district. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (TH) (cc: Plaintiff via U.S. Mail)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
LOIS ALLEN,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
CASE NO. C17-1451 MJP
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
v.
CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES,
Defendant.
15
16
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a 73-page complaint (Dkt. No. 3)
17
and a Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dkt. No. 4.) The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s pleadings
18
and concluded that her case cannot be litigated in this district.
19
All of the conduct and conditions of which Plaintiff complains occurred in Anchorage.
20
Therefore, her claims arose in the District of Alaska and not in the Western District of
21
Washington. Accordingly, venue is proper in the District of Alaska and not here. See 28 U.S.C.
22
23
24
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE - 1
1
§ 1391(b) 1. When a case is filed in the wrong district, the district court "shall dismiss, or if it be
2
in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been
3
brought." 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). Plaintiff will not be prejudiced by dismissal of the instant
4
complaint as there is nothing to prevent her from re-filing it in the District of Alaska. Therefore,
5
IT IS ORDERED that the above-entitled matter is DISMISSED without prejudice to re-
6
file the claims in the proper district.
7
8
The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to Plaintiff.
9
Dated October 19, 2017.
11
A
12
Marsha J. Pechman
United States District Judge
10
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1
Venue would also be proper in any district in which the defendant resides. See 28
U.S.C. § 1391(b). It appears that the Defendant resides in Alaska as well.
24
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?