United States of America v. Mitchell et al

Filing 18

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 17 Motion for Application to Terminate Garnishment Proceeding (Mikron Washington, LLC.). Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (LH) (cc: Defendant and Garnishee via US mail)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-01491-JLR Document 18 Filed 03/01/22 Page 1 of 2 1 The Honorable James L. Robart 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 vs. BENJAMIN MITCHELL, 17 MIKRON WASHINGTON, LLC., Garnishee. 19 21 22 23 This matter came before the Court on the United States’ Application to Terminate Garnishment Proceeding. For the reasons stated in the United States’ Application, the Court concludes that this Garnishment should be terminated, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 3205(c)(10)(A). IT IS ORDERED that the garnishment is terminated and that Mikron 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Order Terminating Garnishment Proceeding and 18 20 (2:07-CR-0095-1) Defendant/Judgment Debtor, 15 16 NO. 2:17-cv-1491-JLR Washington, LLC is relieved of further responsibility pursuant to this garnishment. // [PROPOSED] ORDER TERMINATING GARNISHMENT PROCEEDING (USA v. Benjamin Kevin Mitchell and Mikron Washington, LLC., USDC#: 2:17-cv01491-JLR 2:07-CR-0095-1)1 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 SEATTLE, WA 98101 PHONE: 206-553-7970 Case 2:17-cv-01491-JLR Document 18 Filed 03/01/22 Page 2 of 2 1 DATED this 1st day of March, 2022. 2 A 3 4 JUDGE JAMES L. ROBART UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presented by: s/ Kyle A. Forsyth KYLE A. FORSYTH, WSBA # 34609 Assistant United States Attorney 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER TERMINATING GARNISHMENT PROCEEDING (USA v. Benjamin Kevin Mitchell and Mikron Washington, LLC., USDC#: 2:17-cv01491-JLR 2:07-CR-0095-1)2 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 SEATTLE, WA 98101 PHONE: 206-553-7970

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?