United States of America v. Mitchell et al
Filing
18
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 17 Motion for Application to Terminate Garnishment Proceeding (Mikron Washington, LLC.). Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (LH) (cc: Defendant and Garnishee via US mail)
Case 2:17-cv-01491-JLR Document 18 Filed 03/01/22 Page 1 of 2
1
The Honorable James L. Robart
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
vs.
BENJAMIN MITCHELL,
17
MIKRON WASHINGTON, LLC.,
Garnishee.
19
21
22
23
This matter came before the Court on the United States’ Application to
Terminate Garnishment Proceeding. For the reasons stated in the United
States’ Application, the Court concludes that this Garnishment should be
terminated, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 3205(c)(10)(A).
IT IS ORDERED that the garnishment is terminated and that Mikron
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order Terminating
Garnishment Proceeding
and
18
20
(2:07-CR-0095-1)
Defendant/Judgment Debtor,
15
16
NO. 2:17-cv-1491-JLR
Washington, LLC is relieved of further responsibility pursuant to this
garnishment.
//
[PROPOSED] ORDER TERMINATING GARNISHMENT PROCEEDING
(USA v. Benjamin Kevin Mitchell and Mikron Washington, LLC., USDC#: 2:17-cv01491-JLR 2:07-CR-0095-1)1
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
SEATTLE, WA 98101
PHONE: 206-553-7970
Case 2:17-cv-01491-JLR Document 18 Filed 03/01/22 Page 2 of 2
1
DATED this 1st day of March, 2022.
2
A
3
4
JUDGE JAMES L. ROBART
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
Presented by:
s/ Kyle A. Forsyth
KYLE A. FORSYTH, WSBA # 34609
Assistant United States Attorney
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER TERMINATING GARNISHMENT PROCEEDING
(USA v. Benjamin Kevin Mitchell and Mikron Washington, LLC., USDC#: 2:17-cv01491-JLR 2:07-CR-0095-1)2
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
SEATTLE, WA 98101
PHONE: 206-553-7970
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?