Enstad et al v. PeaceHealth

Filing 40

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 39 Stipulated Motion to Stay Proceedings for Additional 60 Days. The existing stay shall continue for an additional 60 days. Parties to file an update with the Court by 9/23/2018 re settlement negotiations. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 11 CHERYL ENSTAD et al., 12 13 No. C17-1496 RSM ORDER RE: STIPULATED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS FOR ADDITIONAL 60 DAYS Plaintiffs, vs. 14 15 PEACEHEALTH, Defendant. 16 17 18 THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Stipulated Motion of Defendant 19 PeaceHealth (“PeaceHealth”), through counsel, and Plaintiffs Cheryl and Pax Enstad 20 (“Plaintiffs”), through counsel, to stay proceedings in this action, the Court having considered the 21 Stipulated Motion, and finding good cause therefore, it is therefore: 22 ORDERED that: 23 1. 24 25 The existing stay of all proceedings in this action shall continue for an additional 60 days. 2. The parties shall file an update with the Court on or before September 23, 2018 26 regarding the status of the parties’ settlement negotiations within 60 days unless the case has been 27 settled and dismissed by that date. 28 ORDER RE: STIPULATED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS FOR ADDITIONAL 60 DAYS No. 2:17−cv−01496−RSM 1 M ANATT , P HELPS & P HILLIPS , LLP 11355 WEST OLYMPIC BLVD . L OS A NGELES , CA 90064 310-312-4000 1 2 Dated this 24th day of July 2018. A 3 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 Presented by: 10 11 12 13 14 /s/Craig S. Rutenberg Craig S. Rutenberg MANATT PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP Attorneys for Defendant PEACEHEALTH 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER RE: STIPULATED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS FOR ADDITIONAL 60 DAYS No. 2:17−cv−01496−RSM 2 M ANATT , P HELPS & P HILLIPS , LLP 11355 WEST OLYMPIC BLVD . L OS A NGELES , CA 90064 310-312-4000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?