McKoby v. Post et al

Filing 3

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and recommending review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. (PM) Modified on 10/17/2017: copy sent to plaintiff via first class mail (PM).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 5 6 7 8 11 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND RECOMMENDATION FOR REVIEW Plaintiff, 9 10 Case No. C17-1517-RSM WM. MCKOBY – IN PROPRIA PERSONA, v. GLEN POST, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in the above-entitled action. Dkt. 1. After careful consideration of the application, the governing law and the balance of the record, the Court ORDERS as follows: (1) Because plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $400.00 filing fee, he financially qualifies for IFP status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Therefore, plaintiff’s IFP application, Dkt. 1, is GRANTED. However, the undersigned recommends review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). (2) The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff and to the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez. DATED this 17th day of October, 2017. A 24 25 JAMES P. DONOHUE Chief United States Magistrate Judge 26 ORDER PAGE - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?