McKoby v. Post et al

Filing 3

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and recommending review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. (PM) Modified on 10/17/2017: copy sent to plaintiff via first class mail (PM).

1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

5
6
7
8

11

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
AND RECOMMENDATION FOR
REVIEW

Plaintiff,

9
10

Case No. C17-1517-RSM

WM. MCKOBY – IN PROPRIA
PERSONA,

v.
GLEN POST, et al.,

12

Defendants.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis
(“IFP”) in the above-entitled action. Dkt. 1. After careful consideration of the application, the
governing law and the balance of the record, the Court ORDERS as follows:
(1)

Because plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $400.00

filing fee, he financially qualifies for IFP status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Therefore,
plaintiff’s IFP application, Dkt. 1, is GRANTED. However, the undersigned recommends
review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
(2)

The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff and to

the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez.
DATED this 17th day of October, 2017.

A

24
25

JAMES P. DONOHUE
Chief United States Magistrate Judge

26
ORDER
PAGE - 1