Jackson v. Mallott et al

Filing 12

ORDER granting plaintiff's 11 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) (Plaintiff's 10 IFP Motion terminated)

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

6
7
8

MICHAEL E. JACKSON,
Plaintiff,

9
v.

10
11

ORVILLE B. MALLOTT, et al.,

ORDER RE: APPLICATION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Defendants.

12
13

CASE NO. C17-1521-RSL

Plaintiff submitted a corrected application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). (Dkt. 11.) 1

14
Because plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $400.00 filing fee, he
15
financially qualifies for IFP status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Therefore, plaintiff’s
16
application to proceed IFP (Dkt. 11) is GRANTED. However, the undersigned recommends
17
review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this
18
Order to plaintiff and to the assigned District Judge.
19

DATED this 8th day of November, 2017.

20
21

A

22

Mary Alice Theiler
United States Magistrate Judge

23
1

Plaintiff submitted another IFP application, on the wrong form. (Dkt. 10.) That application should
be terminated and the noting date STRICKEN.

ORDER
PAGE - 1