Jackson v. Mallott et al

Filing 12

ORDER granting plaintiff's 11 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) (Plaintiff's 10 IFP Motion terminated)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 MICHAEL E. JACKSON, Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 11 ORVILLE B. MALLOTT, et al., ORDER RE: APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Defendants. 12 13 CASE NO. C17-1521-RSL Plaintiff submitted a corrected application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). (Dkt. 11.) 1 14 Because plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $400.00 filing fee, he 15 financially qualifies for IFP status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Therefore, plaintiff’s 16 application to proceed IFP (Dkt. 11) is GRANTED. However, the undersigned recommends 17 review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this 18 Order to plaintiff and to the assigned District Judge. 19 DATED this 8th day of November, 2017. 20 21 A 22 Mary Alice Theiler United States Magistrate Judge 23 1 Plaintiff submitted another IFP application, on the wrong form. (Dkt. 10.) That application should be terminated and the noting date STRICKEN. ORDER PAGE - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?