Preal v. Director Bureau of Prisons

Filing 15

ORDER granting respondent's 12 Motion for Extension of Time. Respondent's return to petitioner's federal habeas petition due by 3/2/2018. Signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. (PM) cc: petitioner via first class mail

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 RONNIE MANUEL PREAL, Petitioner, 9 10 11 Case No. C17-1527-JLR-JPD v. DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF PRISONS, ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Respondent. 12 13 14 This is a federal habeas action filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This matter comes before 15 the Court at the present time on respondent’s motion for an extension of time to file a return to 16 petitioner’s federal habeas petition. Petitioner has not opposed the motion. The Court, having 17 reviewed respondent’s motion, and the balance of the record, hereby ORDERS as follows: 18 (1) Respondent’s motion for an extension of time to file a return to petitioner’s 19 federal habeas petition (Dkt. 12) is GRANTED. Respondent is directed to file and serve a return 20 not later than March 2, 2018. Respondent shall note the return for consideration on the fourth 21 Friday after it is filed, and the Clerk shall note the return accordingly. Petitioner may file and 22 serve a response not later than the Monday immediately preceding the Friday appointed for 23 ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - 1 1 consideration of the matter, and respondent may file and serve a reply brief not later than the 2 Friday designated for consideration of the matter. 3 4 5 (2) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for respondent, and to the Honorable James L. Robart. DATED this 9th day of February, 2018. A 6 JAMES P. DONOHUE Chief United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?