Okolie v. City of Seattle et al

Filing 14

ORDER granting Defendant City of Seattle's 10 Motion re: Plaintiff's Case Obligations and Enforcing Prior Orders and Response to January 12 Order to Show Cause. No later than March 2, 2018, Plaintiff and counsel for the City shall meet in person at a time and place that the parties mutually agree on to conduct the conference that Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) requires; Joint Status report due no later than 3/21/2018. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (TH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 EDMUND OKOLIE, No. 9 10 11 12 13 14 C17-1531 RSM Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF SEATTLE, THE SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, LINDSAY BROWN, DAVID BAUER, MICHAEL SILVAGNI, JAMES BALAWA, AND ROGER RUSNESS ORDER GRANTING CITY OF SEATTLE’S MOTION FOR ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S CASE OBLIGATIONS AND ENFORCING PRIOR ORDERS, AND RESPONSE TO JANUARY 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 THIS MATTER, having come before the Court on Defendant, City of Seattle’s (hereinafter “City”) Motion for Order re: Plaintiff’s Case Obligations and Enforcing Prior Orders, and Response to January 12 Order to Show Cause, and the Court having read and considered the records and files herein, and the Court being fully advised in the premises, it is HEREBY ORDERED: 1) No later than March 2, 2018, Plaintiff and counsel for the City shall meet in person at a time and place that the parties mutually agree on. They shall conduct the conference that 22 23 ORDER GRANTING CITY OF SEATTLE’S MOTION RE CASE OBLIGATIONS OKOLIE V. CITY OF SEATTLE ET AL. (17-cv-1531RSM) - 1 Peter S. Holmes Seattle City Attorney 701 5th Avenue, Suite 2050 Seattle, WA 98104-7097 (206) 684-8200 1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) requires. Plaintiff may bring a person to serve as an interpreter, but 2 the City is not obligated to provide an interpreter for Plaintiff. 3 2) Within one week of that meeting, counsel for the City shall mail Plaintiff a draft of a joint 4 status report. Within one week of receiving that report, Plaintiff shall telephone counsel 5 for the City to inform the City of any requested changes. The City shall file the report no 6 later than March 21, 2018. 7 3) Within 14 days of the filing of the joint status report, Plaintiff shall provide the 8 interrogatory responses and responses to requests for production that are detailed in the 9 Honorable Richard A. Jones’s November 22, 2016 order in Plaintiff’s previous suit (No. 10 15-1258RAJ). 11 4) The Court and the City (and any Defendant Plaintiff later joins in this action) are entitled 12 to presume that Plaintiff received any document mailed to him at his address of record 13 within three days of its mailing. Plaintiff is responsible for updating the Court and the 14 City regarding any changes in address. 15 5) In accordance with Judge Jones’s January 24, 2017 order, all orders entered by the Court 16 in Plaintiff’s previous lawsuit (No. 15-cv-1258-RAJ) remain in effect in this action. 17 6) Plaintiff is responsible for complying with this order, Judge Jones’s order, and any other 18 obligations imposed by the Court or the Local Rules. Failure to comply may result in 19 sanctions, including dismissal of this action. 20 DATED this 16th day of February 2018. 21 22 23 A RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER GRANTING CITY OF SEATTLE’S MOTION RE CASE OBLIGATIONS OKOLIE V. CITY OF SEATTLE ET AL. (17-cv-1531RSM) - 2 Peter S. Holmes Seattle City Attorney 701 5th Avenue, Suite 2050 Seattle, WA 98104-7097 (206) 684-8200

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?