Fatty v. Duke et al

Filing 3

ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL AND DIRECTING SERVICE re: Petitioner's 2 Motion for Temporary Stay of Removal. Electronic posting of this Order and petitioner's § 2241 habeas petition shall effect service upon the United States Attorney of the petition and of all related and supporting documents. Respondent's return due within 30 days. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM) cc: NWDC via email and notified by phone as well

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 BANGALLY FATTY, Petitioner, 9 10 11 Case No. C17-1535-MJP-BAT v. ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL AND DIRECTING SERVICE ELAINE DUKE, et al., Respondents. 12 13 14 Petitioner Bangally Fatty is a native and citizen of Gambia who is currently detained by 15 U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) at the Northwest Detention Center. On 16 October 13, 2017, petitioner, proceeding through counsel, filed a petition for writ of habeas 17 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, together with an emergency motion for stay of removal. 18 Dkts. 1, 2. Petitioner, by way of the instant habeas action, seeks to preserve his right to an 19 adjudication of his T (trafficking victim) visa application. He also challenges ICE’s recent 20 refusal to accept and consider his I-246 request for stay of removal. Petitioner asserts that he 21 requires a stay of removal because physical presence in the United States is an eligibility 22 requirement for a T visa. 23 ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL AND DIRECTING SERVICE - 1 1 The Court, having reviewed petitioner’s submissions, hereby ORDERS as follows: 2 (1) In light of the immediacy of the harm to petitioner before an opportunity for 3 review of the case on the merits takes place, petitioner’s removal is temporarily STAYED 4 pending briefing and a resolution of petitioner’s motion for stay. The Court expresses no views 5 at this time as to the merits of petitioner’s habeas petition or motion for stay. (2) 6 If not previously accomplished, electronic posting of this Order and petitioner’s 7 § 2241 habeas petition shall effect service upon the United States Attorney of the petition and of 8 all related and supporting documents. Service upon the United States Attorney is deemed to be 9 service upon the named respondents. (3) 10 Within thirty (30) days after such service, respondents shall show cause why a writ 11 of habeas corpus should not be granted by filing and serving a return as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 12 2243. As a part of the return, respondents shall submit a memorandum of authorities in support of 13 their position and state whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary. Also as a part of the return, 14 respondents shall respond to petitioner’s request for stay. (4) 15 The return will be treated in accordance with Local Rule LCR 7. Accordingly, on 16 the face of the return, respondents shall note it for consideration on the fourth Friday after it is 17 filed, and the Clerk shall note the return accordingly. Petitioner may file and serve a response not 18 later than the Monday immediately preceding the Friday appointed for consideration of the matter, 19 and respondents may file and serve a reply brief not later than the Friday designated for 20 consideration of the matter. 21 // 22 // 23 // ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL AND DIRECTING SERVICE - 2 1 2 3 (5) The Clerk shall send copies of this Order to counsel for petitioner and to the Honorable Brian A. Tsuchida. DATED this __16th___ day of October, 2017. 4 6 A 7 Marsha J. Pechman United States District Judge 5 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL AND DIRECTING SERVICE - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?