Fatty v. Duke et al

Filing 8

ORDER granting 7 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time. Clerk directed to renote respondent's 5 MOTION to Dismiss, and petitioner's 2 MOTION to Stay for 12/22/2017. Petitioner's response to motion to dismiss due 12/11/2017; Reply due 12/22/2017. Signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 BANGALLY FATTY, Petitioner, 9 10 11 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME v. ELAINE DUKE, et al., Respondents. 12 13 CASE NO. C17-1535-MJP-BAT The Court GRANTS the parties’ stipulated motion for extension of time, Dkt. 7, and 14 ORDERS: 15 (1) 16 17 18 19 The Clerk shall RENOTE respondents’ motion to dismiss, Dkt. 5, and petitioner’s motion to stay, Dkt. 2, for December 22, 2017. (2) Petitioner may respond to the motion to dismiss by December 11, 2017, and respondents may reply by December 22, 2017. DATED this 28th day of November, 2017. 20 A 21 BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA United States Magistrate Judge 22 23 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?