Vardi et al v. Duke et al
Filing
17
ORDER per parties' 16 Stipulation, Defendant's 14 Motion to Dismiss is continued to 2/16/2018. Opposition due 2/12/2018; Reply due 2/16/2018. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
1
2
3
4
HON. RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON
8
9
10
ALEX VARDI and NAFISEH SAMSAM,
11
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
v.
KIRSTJEN NIELSON, SECRETARY OF
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY; L. FRANCIS CISSNA,
DIRECTOR OF U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND
IMMIGRATION SERVICES; CYNTHIA
MUNITA, FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR
OF THE USCIS SEATTLE OFFICE;
JEFFREY SESSIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF THE UNITED STATES,
19
20
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:17-cv-1619-RSM
ORDER TO
CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO
DISMISS
21
22
23
24
25
26
Upon consideration of the parties’ Stipulation to Continue Defendant’s Motion to
Dismiss to Friday, February 16, 2018 and to Revise Briefing Schedule, and good cause
appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is hereby
continued to Friday, February 16, 2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’
ORDER TO CONTINUE -1
CONTINUE HEARING ON
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
LAW OFFICE OF JEFFREY GOLDMAN
1001 4th Avenue, Suite 3200
Seattle, WA 98154
(206) 488-9030 FAX (888) 282-6930
1
2
3
4
5
briefing schedule be as follows:
1) Plaintiff shall file and serve their opposition to the motion no later than
Monday, February 12, 2018.
2) Defendants shall file and serve their reply to the opposition no later than
Friday, February 16, 2018.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated: January 22, 2018.
A
9
10
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER TO CONTINUE -2
CONTINUE HEARING ON
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
LAW OFFICE OF JEFFREY GOLDMAN
1001 4th Avenue, Suite 3200
Seattle, WA 98154
(206) 488-9030 FAX (888) 282-6930
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?