Vardi et al v. Duke et al

Filing 17

ORDER per parties' 16 Stipulation, Defendant's 14 Motion to Dismiss is continued to 2/16/2018. Opposition due 2/12/2018; Reply due 2/16/2018. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 HON. RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 8 9 10 ALEX VARDI and NAFISEH SAMSAM, 11 Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 v. KIRSTJEN NIELSON, SECRETARY OF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; L. FRANCIS CISSNA, DIRECTOR OF U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES; CYNTHIA MUNITA, FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR OF THE USCIS SEATTLE OFFICE; JEFFREY SESSIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, 19 20 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:17-cv-1619-RSM ORDER TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 21 22 23 24 25 26 Upon consideration of the parties’ Stipulation to Continue Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss to Friday, February 16, 2018 and to Revise Briefing Schedule, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is hereby continued to Friday, February 16, 2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ ORDER TO CONTINUE -1 CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS LAW OFFICE OF JEFFREY GOLDMAN 1001 4th Avenue, Suite 3200 Seattle, WA 98154 (206) 488-9030 FAX (888) 282-6930 1 2 3 4 5 briefing schedule be as follows: 1) Plaintiff shall file and serve their opposition to the motion no later than Monday, February 12, 2018. 2) Defendants shall file and serve their reply to the opposition no later than Friday, February 16, 2018. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: January 22, 2018. A 9 10 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER TO CONTINUE -2 CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS LAW OFFICE OF JEFFREY GOLDMAN 1001 4th Avenue, Suite 3200 Seattle, WA 98154 (206) 488-9030 FAX (888) 282-6930

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?