Li v. Britt et al

Filing 13

ORDER granting 12 Joint Motion to Dismiss case with prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction for the sole purpose of hearing and deciding Plaintiff's motion for attorney fees. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT

7
8

KWAN K. LI,
Plaintiff,

9
vs.

10
11

KEVIN L. BRITT, and LAW OFFICE OF
KEVIN L BRITT, P.S.,

12

No. C17-1624 RSM
ORDER ON JOINT MOTION TO
DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE;
RESERVING THE COURT’S DECISION
ON ATTORNEY FEES

Defendants.

13
14
15
16
17

THIS MATTER, having come before the Court on the Parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss
With Prejudice; Reserving to Court Decision on Attorney Fees, the Court having reviewed the
records and files herein, and the Court being advised in the premises, now, therefore, it is
ORDERED that:
1.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Plaintiffs’ Complaint is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants.

2.

18

This case shall be CLOSED with the Court retaining jurisdiction for the sole

purpose of hearing and deciding Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees, in accordance with the
Parties’ settlement agreement. Such motion shall be filed within two weeks of entry of this Order,
and shall be noted as a standard three-Friday motion, in accordance with LCR 7.
//
//
//
ORDER ON JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS WITH
PREJUDICE; RESERVING TO COURT DECISION ON
ATTORNEY FEES - 1
2:17-cv-01624-RSM
Li 17-1624.ord-dsm.docx

1
2

DATED this 8th day of February 2018.

A

3

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

ORDER ON JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS WITH
PREJUDICE; RESERVING TO COURT DECISION ON
ATTORNEY FEES - 2
2:17-cv-01624-RSM
Li 17-1624.ord-dsm.docx