Allen v. Miller et al
Filing
10
ORDER signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. Plaintiff's amended complaint and this action are DISMISSED without prejudice as to Defendants Pete Maxson, Louise Stemler, Scott Hau kins, Correctional Officer Wray and Sherry Pendergrass. Judge Theiler is INSTRUCTED to issue a service order directing service of plaintiff's amended complaint on defendant Mark Miller. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Joseph Allen, Prisoner ID: 904219)(ST)
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
JOSEPH M. ALLEN,
10
Plaintiff,
11
ORDER
v.
12
CASE NO. C17-1625-JCC
MARK MILLER, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s amended complaint (Dkt. No. 7) and
16
the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 8) of the Honorable Mary Alice Theiler, United
17
States Magistrate Judge, for which no objections have been filed. Having thoroughly considered
18
the relevant record, the Court ORDERS as follows:
19
(1)
The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 9) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
20
(2)
Plaintiff’s amended complaint (Dkt. No. 7) and this action are DISMISSED,
21
without prejudice, as to Defendants Pete Maxson, Louise Stemler, Scott Haukins, Correctional
22
Officer Wray, and Sherry Pendergrass for failure to adequately allege a claim upon which relief
23
may be granted in this civil rights action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii);
24
25
(3)
Judge Theiler is INSTRUCTED to issue a service order directing service of
Plaintiff’s amended complaint on defendant Mark Miller; and
26
ORDER
C17-1625-JCC
PAGE - 1
1
2
3
(4)
The Clerk is DIRECTED to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and to the
Honorable Mary Alice Theiler.
DATED this 7th day of February 2018.
A
4
5
6
John C. Coughenour
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER
C17-1625-JCC
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?