Gorgees v. Berryhill

Filing 11

ORDER granting parties' 10 Stipulated Motion to Remand. The matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)

Download PDF
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 WAFAA S. GORGEES, 10 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 11 12 CASE NO. C17-1662-JCC NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 13 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ stipulated motion to reverse and remand for further proceedings (Dkt. No. 10). The motion is GRANTED. The Court hereby REVERSES that the Commissioner’s decision in regard to Plaintiff’s 19 application for disability insurance and supplemental security income payments, pursuant to 20 sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g). The matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further 21 administrative proceedings. On remand, the administrative law judge will: 22 23 24 25 (1) reevaluate the opinion evidence pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 416.927 for the period prior to June 12, 2017; (2) reevaluate the claimant’s residual functional capacity in accordance with Social Security Ruling 96-8p for the period prior to June 12, 2017; 26 ORDER C17-1662-JCC PAGE - 1 1 (3) if warranted, obtain vocational expert evidence and determine whether that evidence 2 is consistent with Social Security Ruling 00-4p for the period prior to June 12, 2017; 3 and 4 (4) issue a new decision for the period prior to June 12, 2017. 5 Per the parties’ stipulation, Plaintiff will be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and 6 expenses pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2412 and costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1920 upon 7 proper motion to the Court. 8 DATED this 15th day of May, 2018. A 9 10 11 John C. Coughenour UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER C17-1662-JCC PAGE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?